2000
DOI: 10.1080/000164700317393358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene and polytetrafluoroethylene in a hip simulator: A dose-response study of protein concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With distilled water plus Ostenil ® PTFE wear was lower, with a wear factor of 10 × 10 −6 mm 3 /Nm measured. Previous wear tests of PTFE with distilled water as a lubricant have also shown lower wear than when bovine serum is used [48]. Lubricant uptake by the PTFE control pins was negligible compared with the weight loss due to wear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…With distilled water plus Ostenil ® PTFE wear was lower, with a wear factor of 10 × 10 −6 mm 3 /Nm measured. Previous wear tests of PTFE with distilled water as a lubricant have also shown lower wear than when bovine serum is used [48]. Lubricant uptake by the PTFE control pins was negligible compared with the weight loss due to wear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The use of saline resulted in the highest wear rate of 0.89 ± 0.08 and 1.23 ± 0.07 mm 3 /Mc (Groups 4 and 5, respectively). The higher wear rate for Group 4 was expected, given that saline lacks any lubricating proteins [30], and yielded the opposite result of polymer on metal articulations [17,18]. Given the lack of evidence for third body wear from the imaging assessment for Group 5 as compared to Group 4, it is believed that slow dissolution of the coating and/or physical removal of the HA coating during specimen handling during testing is responsible for the difference in mass loss; the cycle intervals were decreased to minimize handling of the coated devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For example, an increase in the sliding distance a bearing surface travels can result in increased wear [15,16]. Decreasing the quantity of protein in the lubricant can increase the wear rate of UHMWPE on CoCr and decrease the wear rate of PTFE on CoCr, but testing both in a zero protein fluid yields unrealistically low wear rates for both as compared to clinical retrieval analyses [17,18]. In addition, multidirectional or ''cross-shear'' motion can increase the wear rate by an order of magnitude [19][20][21][22] or not have an effect at all [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However higher friction in most cases does not necessarily imply higher wear and one should evaluate wear behavior independently from friction experiments. Protein adsorption has been previously reported to increase the wear rates of UHMWPE [12,37] as well as decrease them [38,39]. The effect of the denatured layer on the adhesive wear response is the focus of the authors' present research.…”
Section: Contact Angle Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 94%