2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2162-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear in total knee arthroplasty—just a question of polyethylene?

Abstract: Purpose Biological reactions against wear particles are a common cause for revision in total knee arthroplasty. To date, wear has mainly been attributed to polyethylene. However, the implants have large metallic surfaces that also could potentially lead to metal wear products (metal ions and debris). The aim of this study was to determine the local release of cobalt, chromium, molybdenum and titanium in total knee arthroplasty during a standard knee wear test. Methods Four moderately conforming fixed-bearing i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implants can produce a cell response, not only in close proximity, but may also may trigger a systemic response with the immune component. Although the influence of the implants are evaluated in local tissue or in blood [26], that is currently in use, to the best of the knowledge of the authors of the current study, there is no information confirming distant tissue TE alternation in such cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Implants can produce a cell response, not only in close proximity, but may also may trigger a systemic response with the immune component. Although the influence of the implants are evaluated in local tissue or in blood [26], that is currently in use, to the best of the knowledge of the authors of the current study, there is no information confirming distant tissue TE alternation in such cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Wear products in artificial joints may induce biological reactions [106][107][108], such as irritation and the local accumulation of macrophages and osteoclasts [109]. Some work reported that particles in the size range of 0.1-1 mm were the most biological active [107].…”
Section: Comparison Of Human Wear Particles and Those Of Polyethylenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innocenti [14] gives an excellent understanding on how to diagnose and treat patients with such a condition reporting encouraging results when an appropriate diagnostic protocol is applied and an appropriate allergic implant is positioned, and Kretzner [15] remind us that hypersensitivity may start from the positioned implant releasing metal ions from wear of the substrate determining local response and thus. similarly to P.E debris, to loosening of the implant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%