2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-015-0581-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear Debris Mobility, Aligned Surface Roughness, and the Low Wear Behavior of Filled Polytetrafluoroethylene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction in the friction coefficient with the sliding distance in fault lubrication processes 56 provides another consistent observation, under the reasonable assumption that wear rate and friction variations are similar under those conditions 57,58 . Likewise, shear experiments on rocks have shown vanishing wear rates in a three-body steady-state configuration 58 , and wear experiments have displayed a reduction in the wear rate if the wear debris is not evacuated 53,59,60 . We ascribe the change in the wear rate, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction in the friction coefficient with the sliding distance in fault lubrication processes 56 provides another consistent observation, under the reasonable assumption that wear rate and friction variations are similar under those conditions 57,58 . Likewise, shear experiments on rocks have shown vanishing wear rates in a three-body steady-state configuration 58 , and wear experiments have displayed a reduction in the wear rate if the wear debris is not evacuated 53,59,60 . We ascribe the change in the wear rate, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in load [49], velocity [6,49] and counterface roughness [13,28,32,50] can all change the system's wear performance by affecting the transfer film's mechanical and adhesive strength.…”
Section: Chemistry Of the Transfer Filmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the friction process progresses, this third body is likely to enter the contact area to bear the load by separating the asperities of the friction surfaces to reduce the adsorption force of the friction interface [ 28 ], or by forming a transfer layer with excellent adhesive force to prevent direct contact between the asperities of the test pieces and the counter material. In either case, the base materials are protected [ 37 , 60 ]. Compared with IF-MoS 2 , the 2H-MoS 2 additive forms particles and debris with larger sizes, which cannot easily enter the contact area and thus provide less protection for the base materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%