Abstract:Cross-linked polyethylene currently is being introduced in knee prostheses. The wear rates, wear debris, and biologic reactivity of non cross-linked, moderately cross-linked, and highly cross-linked polyethylene have been compared in multidirectional wear tests and knee simulators. Multidirectional pin-on-plate wear studies of noncross-linked, moderately cross-linked (5 Mrad), and highly cross-linked (10 Mrad) polyethylene showed a 75% reduction in wear with the highly cross-linked material under kinematics fo… Show more
“…The improvement in wear performance in XLPE tibial inserts is supported by wear simulator experiments [12,22,33,34], but evidence of in vivo success is required for a comprehensive assessment. In our study, retrieval analysis was used to compare the accumulation of damage in vivo of conventional and highly crosslinked PE tibial plateaus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, knee simulator studies use gravimetric methods to measure the amount of PE worn from the articulating surfaces [12,22,33,34]. Of course this approach cannot be applied to retrieved implants because the original weights of the implants are unknown and the implants may show added weight through embedded thirdbody particles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XLPE was more recently introduced into TKA after in vitro knee simulator findings of lower wear rates compared with those found with conventional PE [12,22,33,34]. Thus far, however, the clinical benefit of XLPE remains unclear.…”
Background Highly crosslinked ultrahigh-molecularweight polyethylene (XLPE) has been shown to reduce wear in hip arthroplasty, but the advantages over conventional polyethylene (PE) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), if any, remain unclear. Questions/purposes Do differences exist in (1) surface damage as measured by damage score and percent area affected; and (2) extent and location of dimensional changes between XLPE and conventional PE observed on retrieved TKA tibial inserts?Methods In this study of components retrieved at the time of revision surgery, we matched 44 XLPE to 44 conventional PE inserts from four manufacturers; the matching approach considered implant design (exact match), insert size (exact match), and length of implantation (matched ± 6 months). Surface damage on the articular surfaces was subjectively graded and digitally mapped to determine the percent damaged area of each damage mode. Three-dimensional changes that had occurred as a result of implantation were determined by comparing laser scans of the retrieved inserts with size-matched pristine inserts. Results The differences of damage scores and percent damaged areas between the matched XLPE and conventional PE inserts were not large enough to be clinically significant with low corresponding levels of statistical significance (scores: 42 ± 13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38-46 versus 45 ± 13; 95% CI, 41-49; p = 0.4; percent areas: 54% ± 38%; 95% CI, 44%-64% versus 54% ± 32%; 95% CI, 42%-65%; p = 0.9). However, XLPE inserts showed greater articular surface dimensional changes with high significance (root mean square of the distance: 0.16 ± 0.06 mm; 95% CI, 0.13-0.18 mm versus 0.14 ± 0.05 mm; 95% CI, 0.11-0.16 mm; p = 0.03). Within the same design, deviation patterns were consistent between the two materials; however, as expected, the location of the dimensional changes differed among designs: the negative deviations on the plateaus were centrally located in Zimmer PS inserts, were located on the perimeter in Smith & Nephew PS inserts, and were across the entire surface in DePuy PS inserts.
“…The improvement in wear performance in XLPE tibial inserts is supported by wear simulator experiments [12,22,33,34], but evidence of in vivo success is required for a comprehensive assessment. In our study, retrieval analysis was used to compare the accumulation of damage in vivo of conventional and highly crosslinked PE tibial plateaus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, knee simulator studies use gravimetric methods to measure the amount of PE worn from the articulating surfaces [12,22,33,34]. Of course this approach cannot be applied to retrieved implants because the original weights of the implants are unknown and the implants may show added weight through embedded thirdbody particles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XLPE was more recently introduced into TKA after in vitro knee simulator findings of lower wear rates compared with those found with conventional PE [12,22,33,34]. Thus far, however, the clinical benefit of XLPE remains unclear.…”
Background Highly crosslinked ultrahigh-molecularweight polyethylene (XLPE) has been shown to reduce wear in hip arthroplasty, but the advantages over conventional polyethylene (PE) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), if any, remain unclear. Questions/purposes Do differences exist in (1) surface damage as measured by damage score and percent area affected; and (2) extent and location of dimensional changes between XLPE and conventional PE observed on retrieved TKA tibial inserts?Methods In this study of components retrieved at the time of revision surgery, we matched 44 XLPE to 44 conventional PE inserts from four manufacturers; the matching approach considered implant design (exact match), insert size (exact match), and length of implantation (matched ± 6 months). Surface damage on the articular surfaces was subjectively graded and digitally mapped to determine the percent damaged area of each damage mode. Three-dimensional changes that had occurred as a result of implantation were determined by comparing laser scans of the retrieved inserts with size-matched pristine inserts. Results The differences of damage scores and percent damaged areas between the matched XLPE and conventional PE inserts were not large enough to be clinically significant with low corresponding levels of statistical significance (scores: 42 ± 13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38-46 versus 45 ± 13; 95% CI, 41-49; p = 0.4; percent areas: 54% ± 38%; 95% CI, 44%-64% versus 54% ± 32%; 95% CI, 42%-65%; p = 0.9). However, XLPE inserts showed greater articular surface dimensional changes with high significance (root mean square of the distance: 0.16 ± 0.06 mm; 95% CI, 0.13-0.18 mm versus 0.14 ± 0.05 mm; 95% CI, 0.11-0.16 mm; p = 0.03). Within the same design, deviation patterns were consistent between the two materials; however, as expected, the location of the dimensional changes differed among designs: the negative deviations on the plateaus were centrally located in Zimmer PS inserts, were located on the perimeter in Smith & Nephew PS inserts, and were across the entire surface in DePuy PS inserts.
“…With followup exceeding 12 years, the incidence and extent of osteolysis have been markedly lower for hip arthroplasties using crosslinked PEs [5,27,28]. This outcome contradicts the predictions by some early studies [11,18,25], which indicated the osteolytic potentials with elevated crosslinking could be as high as or higher than for historical PEs. Our results indicated this misprediction was in great part due to inherent limitations of the protocols used to isolate and characterize the PE wear particles generated in laboratory wear simulations.…”
Background Numerous studies indicate highly crosslinked polyethylenes reduce the wear debris volume generated by hip arthroplasty acetabular liners. This, in turns, requires new methods to isolate and characterize them. Questions/purposes We describe a method for extracting polyethylene wear particles from bovine serum typically used in wear tests and for characterizing their size, distribution, and morphology.Methods Serum proteins were completely digested using an optimized enzymatic digestion method that prevented the loss of the smallest particles and minimized their clumping. Density-gradient ultracentrifugation was designed to remove contaminants and recover the particles without filtration, depositing them directly onto a silicon wafer. This provided uniform distribution of the particles and high contrast against the background, facilitating accurate, automated, morphometric image analysis. The accuracy and precision of the new protocol were assessed by recovering and characterizing particles from wear tests of three types of polyethylene acetabular cups (no crosslinking and 5 Mrads and 7.5 Mrads of gamma irradiation crosslinking). Results The new method demonstrated important differences in the particle size distributions and morphologic parameters among the three types of polyethylene that could not be detected using prior isolation methods. Conclusion The new protocol overcomes a number of limitations, such as loss of nanometer-sized particles and artifactual clumping, among others. Clinical Relevance The analysis of polyethylene wear particles produced in joint simulator wear tests of prosthetic joints is a key tool to identify the wear mechanisms that produce the particles and predict and evaluate their effects on periprosthetic tissues.
“…A recent study [34] raised concerns that these morphologic characteristics of the wear particles might affect macrophage response and osteolysis. These concerns are reinforced by the results of studies that show increased in vitro bioactivity with the HCLPE particles [16,26]. Only longer followup studies will clarify these questions.…”
Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HCLPE) has been used extensively to decrease osteolysis and related implant failure in THA. We compared the wear rate of HCLPE and noncross-linked conventional PE (CPE) liners and the rate of radiographic calcar resorption and osteolysis in young patients (35-60 years of age) who underwent THA by one surgeon. Thirty-four patients (41 THAs) who received a hybrid THA using a HCLPE liner were matchpaired for age, gender, body mass index, and diagnosis with a group of patients who underwent THA with identical implants but with a CPE liner. The minimum followup was 4 years (average, 5.3; range, 4-8 years). Using the Livermore measurement technique, the averages of total wear of the HCLPE and CPE liners were 0.01 mm (range, -0.23-0.4) and 0.64 mm (range, 0-1.7), respectively. The average annual wear was less for the HCLPE than the noncross-linked PE (0.002 mm, range, -0.05-0.1 versus 0.12 mm, range, 0-0.29, respectively). Four hips in the HCLPE group and 23 in the CPE group had calcar resorption measuring averages of 2.5 mm (range, 2-3) and 7.5 mm (range, 1.8-23.8), respectively. Periprosthetic osteolysis occurred in two and eight hips in the HCLPE and CPE groups, respectively. Longer followup is needed to determine if these findings will result in improved implant survivorship.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.