2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2009.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear comparison between a dual mobility total hip prosthesis and a typical modular design using a hip joint simulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, UHMWPE tests could be run even dry, without any lubricant, and still no damage to the components occurred despite considerable frictional heating [3]. Moreover, edge loading does not increase the wear of UHMWPE cups [29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, UHMWPE tests could be run even dry, without any lubricant, and still no damage to the components occurred despite considerable frictional heating [3]. Moreover, edge loading does not increase the wear of UHMWPE cups [29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wear of conventional UHMWPE inserts of total hip prostheses has been found to be insensitive to the inlination angle of the cup, 48° vs. 60° [21]. With large-diameter MoM however, the wear increased steeply with increasing angle [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another recent validation of the HUT-4 was the fact that a steep angle (60°) did not increase the wear of the polyethylene cup [19]. In the future, the available hip simulator capacity should definitely be utilized more systematically for thorough evaluations of new designs prior to clinical trials so that the likelihood of clinical disasters could be reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%