2015
DOI: 10.1080/10402004.2015.1027432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear Behavior of Aluminum Alloys at Slow Sliding Speeds

Abstract: The investigated slow sliding speeds presented in this work enable the understanding of the wear behaviour on aluminium alloys and could possibly facilitate the completion of the previously proposed wear mechanism map for aluminium at this slow sliding speed range. Dry sliding block-on-ring wear tests were carried out on aluminium alloys, AA5754 (Al-Mg), AA6082 (AlMg-Si) and AA7075 (Al-Zn-Cu), at a very slow sliding speed range (< 0.01 m/s). A bearing steel ring of AISI 52100 was used as counterbody. Tests wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Representative coefficient friction (COF) values recorded as a function of sliding distance under a normal load of 5 N are shown in Figure 6 for both the untreated AA6082 alloy and the anodised surfaces. In the steady-state regime, untreated AA6082 slides against 100Cr6 steel with a COF of about 0.4, lower than for treated samples and consistent with literature data [25][26][27][28]. Moreover, dynamic COF data of the AA6082/steel couple displayed large oscillations, due to stick-slip phenomena [29].…”
Section: Friction and Wear Behavioursupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Representative coefficient friction (COF) values recorded as a function of sliding distance under a normal load of 5 N are shown in Figure 6 for both the untreated AA6082 alloy and the anodised surfaces. In the steady-state regime, untreated AA6082 slides against 100Cr6 steel with a COF of about 0.4, lower than for treated samples and consistent with literature data [25][26][27][28]. Moreover, dynamic COF data of the AA6082/steel couple displayed large oscillations, due to stick-slip phenomena [29].…”
Section: Friction and Wear Behavioursupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The obtained tracks were dark, perhaps related to oxide formation. 41,42 Observing the corresponding ball morphology, both for dry condition (Figure 7a) and with the use of the commercial lubricant (Figure 7e) there was material transfer with the sliding direction designed. The material transfer suggested the development of adhesion 43,44 between the bodies and with the displacement of the ball, the material removal from the plate took place and formed the third body (debris).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, one of the major drawbacks of these materials is their low wear resistance. This limitation is due to the fact that Al alloys undergo extensive plastic deformation and material removal under sliding wear conditions [3][4][5][6][7]. Furthermore, protective layers are not formed on the wear surface of these alloys under severe conditions, and direct metal-to-metal contact occurs between the sliding surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%