2020
DOI: 10.3167/arrs.2020.110105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weapons for Witnessing

Abstract: Drawing on observations of the performances of street preachers in the United States—as well as the texts that inform them—this article explores the concept of rhythm within and beyond the anthropology of religion. More specifically, it develops an expansive concept of rhythm as multiple and interactive, focusing not on a singular rhythm, but on the rhythmic translations that shape the practice of street preaching. First, I argue that the material rhythms of urban infrastructure constrain the narrative rhythms… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, this suasive strategy is quite different to that of the soapbox street preacher (e.g. Byron 2020), or it is at least one with a different ‘devotional rhythm’ (Peña 2017). It was explained to me in countless interviews that an important ‘rule’ given by the organization for sign cart witnessing is that Witnesses do not, as one Witness put it, ‘speak unless spoken to’.…”
Section: ‘Preaching’ As a Suasive Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, this suasive strategy is quite different to that of the soapbox street preacher (e.g. Byron 2020), or it is at least one with a different ‘devotional rhythm’ (Peña 2017). It was explained to me in countless interviews that an important ‘rule’ given by the organization for sign cart witnessing is that Witnesses do not, as one Witness put it, ‘speak unless spoken to’.…”
Section: ‘Preaching’ As a Suasive Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%