2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weaknesses in reports of “fertility” for horses and other species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationships shown here could be of biological significance because of the correlation between the different ROS variables and their relationship with fertility. However, the numbers of mares inseminated per stallion were small and these results should be confirmed on a larger set of stallions and mares as inferences from fertility trials cannot be made reliably on small samples (Amann, 2005). Interestingly, the foaling rates were mostly better than average for cooled semen, being 70% to 91% in the present study compared with 65.2% reported by Rota et al (2004).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The relationships shown here could be of biological significance because of the correlation between the different ROS variables and their relationship with fertility. However, the numbers of mares inseminated per stallion were small and these results should be confirmed on a larger set of stallions and mares as inferences from fertility trials cannot be made reliably on small samples (Amann, 2005). Interestingly, the foaling rates were mostly better than average for cooled semen, being 70% to 91% in the present study compared with 65.2% reported by Rota et al (2004).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Most of these reviews and the literature cited therein consistently concur to a basic fact; routine spermiogram evaluations are suitable to identify clear-cut cases of infertility and, sometimes, to provide cues for potential subfertility, but are not able to prognose levels of fertility of the semen (or the male) in question. 7,13,15,16 The reason is quite obvious: such assessments simply evaluate basic variables of sperm appearance and viability, but cannot disclose subjacent structural details, biochemical and metabolic details, or the capacity of spermatozoa to interact with the environment, in terms of membrane reactivity, unless a battery of tests is used. Neither can they measure whether the genomic message spermatozoa deliver to the gamete counterpart during fertilization is intact enough to warrant the development of the early embryo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sperm doses from a normal stallion, processed and stored under optimal conditions, used for AI in normal mares by experienced personnel. A large sample size is needed to compensate for extraneous variables [20]. Such a fertility trial requires considerable time and resources and is beyond the scope of the present review.…”
Section: Advantages Of Slc For Preparing Stallion Sperm Doses For Aimentioning
confidence: 99%