2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weakly Supervised Semantic Point Cloud Segmentation: Towards 10× Fewer Labels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
178
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
178
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of techniques were developed to reduce the requirement for large quantities of 3D supervision. The most typical strategy is to utilize synthetic data to quickly build large-scale 3D datasets [38]- [41], which has benefited a lot of tasks, such as 3D flow estimation [42] and 3D human reconstruction [43]. Some attempts [44], [45] were made to learn indoor 3D detection through semi-supervised learning techniques, i.e., combine labeled data with unlabeled data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of techniques were developed to reduce the requirement for large quantities of 3D supervision. The most typical strategy is to utilize synthetic data to quickly build large-scale 3D datasets [38]- [41], which has benefited a lot of tasks, such as 3D flow estimation [42] and 3D human reconstruction [43]. Some attempts [44], [45] were made to learn indoor 3D detection through semi-supervised learning techniques, i.e., combine labeled data with unlabeled data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constraints used in [31] are based on the prior knowledge of target size which is reasonable for medical image segmentation but not applicable for our case of baggage security screening where contraband materials can be of arbitrary sizes. Xu et al [32] addressed the incomplete supervision problems in point cloud segmentation. Several complementary components were combined in their framework including an incomplete supervision branch, an inexact supervision branch, Siamese self-supervision, spatial and color smoothness constraints.…”
Section: Weakly Supervised 3d Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the weakly supervised segmentation strategy in [7], we choose to define the total loss objective function L total (ȳ, p(y|P, g, e, Θ, Γ)) by composing the following four constraints based on the partially labelled ground truth ȳ of point cloud semantic category:…”
Section: Feature Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To generate weakly supervised settings, we follow the 0.01 scheme as in the state-of-the-art weakly supervised point cloud segmentation (WSPCS) [7] method, in which only |M| N = 1% points with ground truth labels are randomly selected from each semantic part category of a shape model, thus there are 20 points Fig. 2 Comparison of the total loss as well as three accuracy criteria between WSPCS [7] and ours GECNN approach evaluated on the validation dataset in the training process. The comparison of train loss between WSPCS and GECNN on the train dataset is also illustrated.…”
Section: Validation On Shapenetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation