2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weakly supervised power line detection algorithm using a recursive noisy label update with refined broken line segments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of authors’ knowledge, almost all the studies regarding PL detection use the dice scores (DSC) (also known as the F1-score), precision, true positive rate (TPR) (also known as recall or sensitivity), false discovery rate (FDR) and accuracy [ 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. These evaluation parameters are defined as: DSC or F1-score = 2TP/(2TP + FP +FN) Precision = TP/(TP + FP) TPR or Recall or Sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN) FDR = FP/(FP + TP) Accuracy = (TP + TN)/(TP + TN + FP + FN) where TP, TN, FP and FN represent the true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative entries of the confusion matrix, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To the best of authors’ knowledge, almost all the studies regarding PL detection use the dice scores (DSC) (also known as the F1-score), precision, true positive rate (TPR) (also known as recall or sensitivity), false discovery rate (FDR) and accuracy [ 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. These evaluation parameters are defined as: DSC or F1-score = 2TP/(2TP + FP +FN) Precision = TP/(TP + FP) TPR or Recall or Sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN) FDR = FP/(FP + TP) Accuracy = (TP + TN)/(TP + TN + FP + FN) where TP, TN, FP and FN represent the true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative entries of the confusion matrix, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of authors’ knowledge, all the studies on PL detection utilize the BCE loss [ 6 , 14 , 15 , 16 ] and its class imbalance variants [ 4 , 7 , 12 ] for segmenting the PLs. Although BCE loss is easier to optimize with lower training times, it might not always be the best choice for training deep classification networks [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Related Work and Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations