Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Confere 2015
DOI: 10.3115/v1/p15-1008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weakly Supervised Models of Aspect-Sentiment for Online Course Discussion Forums

Abstract: Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are redefining the education system and transcending boundaries posed by traditional courses. With the increase in popularity of online courses, there is a corresponding increase in the need to understand and interpret the communications of the course participants. Identifying topics or aspects of conversation and inferring sentiment in online course forum posts can enable instructor interventions to meet the needs of the students, rapidly address course-related issues, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meng et al (2018) proposed a weakly supervised text classification method which can take label surface names, class-related keywords, or a few labeled documents as supervision. Ramesh et al (2015) developed a weakly supervised joint model to identify aspects and the corresponding sentiment polarities in online courses. They treat aspect (sentiment) related seed words as weak supervision.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meng et al (2018) proposed a weakly supervised text classification method which can take label surface names, class-related keywords, or a few labeled documents as supervision. Ramesh et al (2015) developed a weakly supervised joint model to identify aspects and the corresponding sentiment polarities in online courses. They treat aspect (sentiment) related seed words as weak supervision.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chaplot, Rhim, and Kim (2015) incorporated the emotional scores of posts into a neural network to predict student attrition in MOOCs. The joint modelling of emotion and topics has drawn increasing attention on capturing latent emotional feedback and requirements during the processes of problem-solving Ramesh, Dan, Huang, Daume, & Getoor, 2014;Ramesh et al, 2015). Besides, confusion has been viewed as an emotion to infer students' potential difficulties and final learning performance in online learning.…”
Section: Emotional States Of Students In Course Forumsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a reflection of student learning experience in discussions, a variety of discourse behaviors could be explored through forum posts, such as interactive postings between peers (Chiu & Hew, 2018), exchanges of learning feelings (Ramesh, Kumar, Foulds, & Getoor, 2015;Wen et al, 2014), expressing opinions (Ekahitanond, 2014;Liu, Zhang, Sun, Cheng, Peng, & Liu, 2016), etc. To get some insights of students' engagement in SPOC forums, we will explore students' engagement patterns in forum discussions in terms of two major factors: behavior and emotion.…”
Section: Research Purpose and Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, dropout predicting (Qiu et al, 2016), sentiment analysis of learning gains (Ramesh et al, 2015), instructor intervention (Chaturvedi et al, 2014) and answer recommendation (Jenders et al, 2016), etc. Particularly, (Agrawal et al, 2015) considers a similar task as ours, which is to recommend video clips to threads.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However their effectiveness is limited (Rossi and Gnawali, 2014), because learners have few incentives to tag threads. Recently, machine learning solutions have been proposed, e.g., content-related thread identification (Wise et al, 2016), confusion classification (Agrawal et al, 2015) and sentiment classification (Ramesh et al, 2015). However they are developed for specific research problems and cannot be applied to our problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%