2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.63.043005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weakly interacting massive particle annual modulation signal and nonstandard halo models

Abstract: Currently the best prospect for detecting Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) is via the annual modulation, which occurs due to the Earth's rotation around the Sun, of the direct detection signal. We investigate the effect of uncertainties in our knowledge of the structure of the galactic halo on the WIMP annual modulation signal. We compare the signal for three non-standard halo models: Evans' power-law halos, Michie models with an asymmetric velocity distribution and Maxwellian halos with bulk rotat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly one observes the SHM is a bad fit to N-body results for the dark matter only simulation (left column). Previous work suggesting that SHM is a bad fit to the true DM velocity distribution in our Galaxy is based on similar dark-matter-only simulations [46]. It is clear from figure 4 however, that including the baryonic physics modifies the velocity distributions in such a way that the SHM is a perfectly adequate description of the velocity distribution, except perhaps in the high velocity tail where the N-body distribution has systematically fewer particles with large speeds (this could also simply be due to small number statistics and higher resolution simulations may find better agreement).…”
Section: Results For Velocity and Speed Distributions In Galactic Resmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Clearly one observes the SHM is a bad fit to N-body results for the dark matter only simulation (left column). Previous work suggesting that SHM is a bad fit to the true DM velocity distribution in our Galaxy is based on similar dark-matter-only simulations [46]. It is clear from figure 4 however, that including the baryonic physics modifies the velocity distributions in such a way that the SHM is a perfectly adequate description of the velocity distribution, except perhaps in the high velocity tail where the N-body distribution has systematically fewer particles with large speeds (this could also simply be due to small number statistics and higher resolution simulations may find better agreement).…”
Section: Results For Velocity and Speed Distributions In Galactic Resmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In order to predict the signal in such experiments for given dark matter particle physics properties it is necessary to specify also its local density and velocity distribution. Very little is known about the details of the local dark matter phase space density and this lack of knowledge introduces significant uncertainty in the interpretation of data from dark matter direct detection experiments [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. To overcome these problems halo independent methods have been developed and applied to data [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We verified that the gravitational potential obtained by solving the Poisson equation for Ī¦ in the limit of spherical symmetry (as explained above), and the exact gravitational potential of our model are sufficiently close to each other. To this aim we calculated the baryonic contribution to the axisymmetric potential of our model, Ī¦ bar (R, z), using the appropriate integral solution of Relative potential in units of c 2 Spherical symmetry Axial symmetry Īø=0 Axial symmetry Īø=Ļ€/4 Axial symmetry Īø=Ļ€/2 Figure 3. Relative gravitational potential as a function of the galactocentric distance computed within the spherical approximation described in the text (blue line) and assuming axial symmetry according to Eq.…”
Section: Mass Model For the Milky Waymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the SHM, the DM is distributed in an isothermal sphere and has a Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution with the peak speed equal to the local circular speed, usually taken to be 220 km/s. The DM velocity distribution could, however, be different from the SHM and this could alter the exclusion limits derived from direct detection [6][7][8][9]. Departures from the SHM do not affect all the experiments in the same way, since, depending on the nuclear target and on the range of recoil energies that are analysed, different detectors probe different regions of the velocity distribution function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%