2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2004.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weakly hyperbolic systems with Hölder continuous coefficients

Abstract: We study the Cauchy Problem for a hyperbolic system with multiple characteristics and non-smooth coefficients depending on time. We prove in particular that, if the leading coefficients are a-Ho¨lder continuous, and the system has size mp3; then the Problem is well posed in each Gevrey class of exponent so1 þ a=m: r 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By Gronwall's Lemma on [c i , d i ] we get the inequality for |ξ| ≥ 1. This proves the C ∞ well-posedness of the Cauchy problem (1). Similarly, (30) implies the well-posedness of (1) in D ′ (R n ).…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By Gronwall's Lemma on [c i , d i ] we get the inequality for |ξ| ≥ 1. This proves the C ∞ well-posedness of the Cauchy problem (1). Similarly, (30) implies the well-posedness of (1) in D ′ (R n ).…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 64%
“…The first results of this type for t-dependent hyperbolic systems of size 2×2 and 3×3 have been obtained by d'Ancona, Kinoshita and Spagnolo in [1,2]. For x-dependent 2×2 systems some results are also available, see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Banach's fixed point theorem ensures the existence of a unique fixed point u 1 for the map G 0 1 . Hence, by assuming that the initial dataŨ 0 1 belongs to C([0, T * ], H s ) we conclude that there exists a unique u 1 ∈ C([0, T * ], H s ) solving (12). Note that the same argument proves that the operator I − G 0 1 is invertible on a sufficiently small interval in t since G 0 1 = I at t = 0.…”
Section: And With the Operators A(t X D X ) And B(t X D X ) Given Bymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…with ω(ε) ≥ cε r for some c, r > 0 and ϕ mollifier as in (9). The corresponding regularised operator…”
Section: Remark 22mentioning
confidence: 99%