Abstract:Mesostructured metal oxides whose framework structures are engineered from materials other than silica make attractive research subjects. However, direct synthesis of these kinds of mesoporous materials using surfactants is quite difficult because, compared to silica, the surfactant/oxide composite precursors are often more susceptible to lack of condensation, redox reactions, or phase transitions accompanied by thermal breakdown of the structural integrity.[1] The nanocasting method for carbon, [2] pioneered … Show more
“…Bruce's work also confirmed that mesoporous Co 3 O 4 , Cr 2 O 3 , Fe 2 O 3 , Mn 2 O 3 , and Mn 3 O 4 catalysts exhibited high catalytic reactivity for CO oxidation [22]. Transition metal oxides are more susceptible to hydrolysis, redox or phase transition reactions, and they simultaneously possess different coordination modes as well as multiple oxidation states, hence, it is difficult to obtain their mesoporous structures [23][24][25][26][27][28]. Modified approaches such as the use of soft or hard templates, hydrothermal or microemulsion strategies have been reported for the synthesis of mesoporous materials [21,25,[29][30][31].…”
A B S T R A C TConsidering the harmful effects of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on the atmosphere and public health, the search for proper catalytic materials for the effective catalytic elimination of VOCs remains one of the most pressing issues in the environmental field. In this study, a series of mesoporous Co 3 O 4 -n (n = 0.00, 0.0001, 0.01, 0.05, 0.10, 1.00, representing the concentration of HNO 3 aqueous solution) catalysts were fabricated by the acid treatment of Co 3 O 4 that was previously prepared via a hydroxycarbonate precipitation method (Co 3 O 4 -P). The catalytic performances of the prepared catalysts were evaluated for the model reaction of toluene oxidation. An obvious enhancement of catalytic activity in the reaction was achieved over the acid-treated Co 3 O 4 catalysts using lower HNO 3 concentrations, with Co 3 O 4 -0.01 exhibiting the optimum catalytic activity (T 90 = 225°C, 15°C lower than that of Co 3 O 4 -P), excellent catalytic durability under dry conditions and a high regeneration capability under humid conditions. Benefitting from the dilute acid treatment, the Co 3 O 4 -n (n = 0.01, 0.05, 0.10) catalysts presented higher specific surface areas, more weak acidic sites and higher abundances of surface Co 2+ and O ads species, which were regarded as the key factors responsible for their enhanced catalytic activities.
“…Bruce's work also confirmed that mesoporous Co 3 O 4 , Cr 2 O 3 , Fe 2 O 3 , Mn 2 O 3 , and Mn 3 O 4 catalysts exhibited high catalytic reactivity for CO oxidation [22]. Transition metal oxides are more susceptible to hydrolysis, redox or phase transition reactions, and they simultaneously possess different coordination modes as well as multiple oxidation states, hence, it is difficult to obtain their mesoporous structures [23][24][25][26][27][28]. Modified approaches such as the use of soft or hard templates, hydrothermal or microemulsion strategies have been reported for the synthesis of mesoporous materials [21,25,[29][30][31].…”
A B S T R A C TConsidering the harmful effects of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on the atmosphere and public health, the search for proper catalytic materials for the effective catalytic elimination of VOCs remains one of the most pressing issues in the environmental field. In this study, a series of mesoporous Co 3 O 4 -n (n = 0.00, 0.0001, 0.01, 0.05, 0.10, 1.00, representing the concentration of HNO 3 aqueous solution) catalysts were fabricated by the acid treatment of Co 3 O 4 that was previously prepared via a hydroxycarbonate precipitation method (Co 3 O 4 -P). The catalytic performances of the prepared catalysts were evaluated for the model reaction of toluene oxidation. An obvious enhancement of catalytic activity in the reaction was achieved over the acid-treated Co 3 O 4 catalysts using lower HNO 3 concentrations, with Co 3 O 4 -0.01 exhibiting the optimum catalytic activity (T 90 = 225°C, 15°C lower than that of Co 3 O 4 -P), excellent catalytic durability under dry conditions and a high regeneration capability under humid conditions. Benefitting from the dilute acid treatment, the Co 3 O 4 -n (n = 0.01, 0.05, 0.10) catalysts presented higher specific surface areas, more weak acidic sites and higher abundances of surface Co 2+ and O ads species, which were regarded as the key factors responsible for their enhanced catalytic activities.
“…[31][32][33][34] Since this situation effectively corresponds to the presence of a ferromagnet in close proximity to an antiferromagnet, additional effects, such as exchange bias, can result (see Section 2.2.2).…”
Section: No or Magnetically Inert Surface Coatingsmentioning
This review focuses on the synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application of magnetic nanoparticles, as well as the magnetic properties of nanostructured systems. Substantial progress in the size and shape control of magnetic nanoparticles has been made by developing methods such as co-precipitation, thermal decomposition and/or reduction, micelle synthesis, and hydrothermal synthesis. A major challenge still is protection against corrosion, and therefore suitable protection strategies will be emphasized, for example, surfactant/polymer coating, silica coating and carbon coating of magnetic nanoparticles or embedding them in a matrix/support. Properly protected magnetic nanoparticles can be used as building blocks for the fabrication of various functional systems, and their application in catalysis and biotechnology will be briefly reviewed. Finally, some future trends and perspectives in these research areas will be outlined.
“…However, bulk Co 3 O 4 usually possesses a low surface area (*20 m 2 /g) which is unfavorable to its applications either as a catalyst or as a catalyst support. Mesoporous Co 3 O 4 , on the other hand, possessing the advantages of large surface areas ([100 m 2 /g) and tunable pore structures, has attracted much attention both in material science and in catalysis [10][11][12][13][14][15]. It has been shown that mesoporous Co 3 O 4 exhibited much better catalytic performance than bulk Co 3 O 4 in CO oxidation [15,16] and in VOC removal [13].…”
We demonstrate a supercritical CO 2 (scCO 2 ) deposition method to synthesize mesostructured Co 3 O 4 with crystalline walls using SBA-15 as the hard template. By variation of the scCO 2 pressure, randomly organized nanorods or a highly ordered mesoporous structure of Co 3 O 4 is obtained after only one filling operation. The catalytic tests show that the randomly organized Co 3 O 4 nanorods display excellent activity for CO oxidation with the complete conversion of CO even at room temperature, while neither the ordered mesoporous nor bulk Co 3 O 4 is active at this low-temperature, demonstrating the important role of Co 3 O 4 morphology in catalysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.