2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016jc012252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weakest winter South China Sea western boundary current caused by the 2015–2016 El Niño event

Abstract: During the winter of 2015–2016, the strongest El Niño event of the twenty‐first century occurred. At the same time, volume transport (VT) time series of the South China Sea western boundary current (SCSWBC) exhibited a minimum value of 3.7 Sv (1 Sv = 1 × 106 m3 s−1) toward the southwest, indicating the weakest strength ever recorded in boreal winter (from November to February). The South China Sea (SCS) cyclonic gyre, inferred from the satellite‐derived surface absolute geostrophic current, was significantly r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We then applied a 10-day running average, obtaining a time series SSHD sat-sat . The correlation (r = 0.70, which exceeds the 99% confidence level) between the observations and SSHD sat-sat was not as strong as the near 0.90 values found in previous studies in other regions such as the Kuroshio 9,16 , the RC near Okinawa 30 , and the South China Sea 31,32 , because high-frequency processes were strong near RES1 (which was also seen in CPIES bottom pressure records) and may contaminate the altimeter data through aliasing. Therefore, we used the sea-level difference between RES4 and Ishigakijima instead (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…We then applied a 10-day running average, obtaining a time series SSHD sat-sat . The correlation (r = 0.70, which exceeds the 99% confidence level) between the observations and SSHD sat-sat was not as strong as the near 0.90 values found in previous studies in other regions such as the Kuroshio 9,16 , the RC near Okinawa 30 , and the South China Sea 31,32 , because high-frequency processes were strong near RES1 (which was also seen in CPIES bottom pressure records) and may contaminate the altimeter data through aliasing. Therefore, we used the sea-level difference between RES4 and Ishigakijima instead (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Therefore, stronger upwelling was observed in the NSCS during the summer of 2016 than during the summer of 2008, although the local wind of 2008 was more favorable to upwelling. Previous studies showed that the variability in the basin‐scale current in the NSCS is closely related to the variability in the basin‐scale wind, Luzon intrusion, and eddy activities (Shu et al, , ; Zhao & Zhu, ; Zhao et al, ; Zhu et al, ). Figure c shows that the difference in basin‐scale wind between 2008 and 2016 was southwestward in the NSCS basin, which could not drive the strong northeastward current in the shelf in the summer of 2016 compared with that in 2008.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LS transport advects the North Pacific signal into the SCS and then impacts the dynamic state of the SCS (Nan et al, 2015;Qu et al, 2000Qu et al, , 2005Qu et al, , 2006Qu et al, , 2009Zhang et al, 2015). LS transport, as a major component of the SCS throughflow (Qu et al, 2004(Qu et al, , 2005Wang et al, 2006), also modulates the thermodynamic state of the SCS (Xiao et al, 2018;Zeng et al, 2014Zeng et al, , 2016Zhao & Zhu, 2016) and plays an important role in the interannual variability of the Indonesian throughflow (Fang et al, 2003;Qu et al, 2009;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largescale Kuroshio intrusion, which carries saline and warm water into the SCS, induces a high-pressure belt along the northern SCS slope and material exchange between the continental shelf and open sea . In the northern SCS, there is a southwestward (northeastward) slope current in winter (summer), which is the northern part of the SCS west boundary current (Shu et al, 2018;Zhao & Zhu, 2016;Zhu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%