2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weakening of quartz rocks at subseismic slip rates due to frictional heating, but not to lubrication by wear materials of hydrated amorphous silica or silica gel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are different from what is observed for quartz‐rich rocks, which often shows a reduction in frictional strength at intermediate slip velocities due to silica‐gel lubrication or the formation of amorphous wear materials (Di Toro et al., 2004; Goldsby & Tullis, 2002; Hayashi & Tsutsumi, 2010; Rowe et al., 2019). This study supports the idea that thermal processes are important for dynamic weakening and that the preexisting amorphous grains themselves do not induce the weakening (Kanagawa et al., 2020). Although the FEM modeling of the single‐ V test could not estimate the T condition inside the gouge, because the measured T was lower than in the multi‐ V test, we speculate that the dynamic weakening in the single‐ V test may instead be caused by flash heating or thermal pressurization, rather than vaporization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These results are different from what is observed for quartz‐rich rocks, which often shows a reduction in frictional strength at intermediate slip velocities due to silica‐gel lubrication or the formation of amorphous wear materials (Di Toro et al., 2004; Goldsby & Tullis, 2002; Hayashi & Tsutsumi, 2010; Rowe et al., 2019). This study supports the idea that thermal processes are important for dynamic weakening and that the preexisting amorphous grains themselves do not induce the weakening (Kanagawa et al., 2020). Although the FEM modeling of the single‐ V test could not estimate the T condition inside the gouge, because the measured T was lower than in the multi‐ V test, we speculate that the dynamic weakening in the single‐ V test may instead be caused by flash heating or thermal pressurization, rather than vaporization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, because the dynamic weakening in the 100% glass sample occurred just after the maximum T within the gouge reached the boiling T of 311℃ for water with 10 MPa (Figure 7c), the observed dynamic weakening in the multi-V test may be caused by vaporization of the pore water (Acosta et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2017;Hunfeld et al, 2021). This result supports the idea that thermal processes are important for dynamic weakening and that the amorphous grains themselves do not induce the weakening (Kanagawa et al, 2020). Although the FEM modeling of the single-V test could not estimate the T condition inside the gouge, because the measured T was lower than in the multi-V test, the dynamic weakening in the single-V test may instead be caused by flash heating or thermal pressurization, rather than vaporization.…”
Section: Dynamic Weakening For 100% Glass Caused By Thermal Processessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…These amorphous silica-related lubrication in LSZ may explain the observed decrease in shear stress during our experiments. On the other hand, Kanagawa et al (2020) recently suggested that not hydration of amorphous silica (formation of silica gel) but frictional heating can be responsible for the decrease in the friction coefficient during their rotary-shear friction experiments using quartz-bearing agate gouges. This mechanism is, however, unlikely to explain a gradual weakening of our quartz gouges as we observed no significant temperature increase during the experiments at 0.001 m s −1 using quartz ( Figure S10).…”
Section: 1029/2020jb019956mentioning
confidence: 99%