2020
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v34i01.5389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak Supervision for Fake News Detection via Reinforcement Learning

Abstract: Today social media has become the primary source for news. Via social media platforms, fake news travel at unprecedented speeds, reach global audiences and put users and communities at great risk. Therefore, it is extremely important to detect fake news as early as possible. Recently, deep learning based approaches have shown improved performance in fake news detection. However, the training of such models requires a large amount of labeled data, but manual annotation is time-consuming and expensive. Moreover,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their model achieved up to 97% accuracy with the LSTM. Wang et al [6] developed the WeFEND framework for automatic annotation of news articles, which used user reports from WeChat as a form of weak supervision for fake news detection. They extracted textual and linguistic features from the data and conducted experiments with reinforcement learning, using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) and LSTM, reaching an accuracy value of up to 82%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their model achieved up to 97% accuracy with the LSTM. Wang et al [6] developed the WeFEND framework for automatic annotation of news articles, which used user reports from WeChat as a form of weak supervision for fake news detection. They extracted textual and linguistic features from the data and conducted experiments with reinforcement learning, using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) and LSTM, reaching an accuracy value of up to 82%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, the rapid spread of large volumes of online information among an increasing number of social network users is observed. It is a phenomenon that has often been exploited by malicious users and entities, which forge, distribute, and reproduce fake news and propaganda [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Fake news is intentionally forged information, which is distributed either to deceive and make false information believable, or to make verifiable facts doubtful [2,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12]15,[19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are a number of studies that compare older methods with the current SOTA (state-of-the-art) methods, using the older methods as a reference point. In [31], the authors compared 10 methods for detecting fake news in WeChat dataset. The presented results clearly indicate that the methods based on deep neural networks, such as CNN (convolutional neural network), LSTM (long short-term memory), EANN (event adversarial neural networks), detect fake news better than traditional methods such as LR, SVM or RF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works on deepfake detection of text are dominated by neural document classification models (Bakhtin et al, 2019;Zellers et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2019;Vijayaraghavan et al, 2020). They typically tackle the problem with coarse-grained document-level evidence such as dense vectors learned by neural encoder and traditional features (e.g., TF-IDF, word counts).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%