2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcta.2020.105357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak saturation numbers of complete bipartite graphs in the clique

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for 2 ≤ s ≤ t and 2 ≤ n ≤ ℓ. Moshkovitz and Shapira [15] deduced from this result that wsat(K n,n , K s,t ) = n 2 − (n − s + 1) 2 + (t − s) 2 for 2 ≤ s ≤ t ≤ n. This result can be easily generalized (see Appendix A in [11]) wsat(K n,ℓ , K s,t ) = (n + ℓ − s + 1)(s − 1) + (t − s) 2 for 2 ≤ s ≤ t, n ≤ ℓ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…for 2 ≤ s ≤ t and 2 ≤ n ≤ ℓ. Moshkovitz and Shapira [15] deduced from this result that wsat(K n,n , K s,t ) = n 2 − (n − s + 1) 2 + (t − s) 2 for 2 ≤ s ≤ t ≤ n. This result can be easily generalized (see Appendix A in [11]) wsat(K n,ℓ , K s,t ) = (n + ℓ − s + 1)(s − 1) + (t − s) 2 for 2 ≤ s ≤ t, n ≤ ℓ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For q = 2, Kalai [Kal85] determined wsat(n, K r,r ). Kronenberg, Martins and Morrison [KMM21] gave recently a new proof of this result, extending it to wsat(n, K r,r−1 ) and asymptotically to all wsat(n, K s,t ). No other values wsat(n, K q r1,...,r d ) are known except for r 1 = • • • = r d = 1 when H is a clique and a handful of closely related cases, e.g., when all r i but one are 1 [Pik01b].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A minor adjustment to our proof gives that, for any rational 0 < α < 1, the quantities wsat(n, H) and wsat(K αn,(1−α)n , H), when αn ∈ Z, are of the same order of magnitude. Setting H = K t,t answers the above question of [KMM21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations