2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak-lensing peaks in simulated light cones: investigating the coupling between dark matter and dark energy

Abstract: In this paper, we study the statistical properties of weak lensing peaks in lightcones generated from cosmological simulations. In order to assess the prospects of such observable as a cosmological probe, we consider simulations that include interacting Dark Energy (hereafter DE) models with coupling term between DE and Dark Matter. Cosmological models that produce a larger population of massive clusters have more numerous high signal-to-noise peaks; among models with comparable numbers of clusters those with … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The DUSTGRAIN-pathfinder simulations have been devised to sample the { f R0 , m ν } parameter space and to identify highly degenerate combinations of parameters. Some analyses of the corresponding WL signal have been presented by Giocoli et al (2018a) and Peel et al (2018), while Hagstotz et al (2018) have used the simulations to calibrate a theoretical modelling of the halo mass function in f (R) gravity with and without the contribution of massive neutrinos. In this further paper, we will use machine learning techniques to tackle the issue of observational degeneracy in these combined models based on the WL reconstruction described in Giocoli et al (2018a).…”
Section: Dustgrain-pathfindermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DUSTGRAIN-pathfinder simulations have been devised to sample the { f R0 , m ν } parameter space and to identify highly degenerate combinations of parameters. Some analyses of the corresponding WL signal have been presented by Giocoli et al (2018a) and Peel et al (2018), while Hagstotz et al (2018) have used the simulations to calibrate a theoretical modelling of the halo mass function in f (R) gravity with and without the contribution of massive neutrinos. In this further paper, we will use machine learning techniques to tackle the issue of observational degeneracy in these combined models based on the WL reconstruction described in Giocoli et al (2018a).…”
Section: Dustgrain-pathfindermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-point statistics fail to capture this non-Gaussian information and thus yield an incomplete description of the matter distribution at low redshift. To close this gap, the community has recently started to explore non-Gaussian cosmic shear estimators: for example weak-lensing peaks (e.g., Kruse & Schneider 1999, 2000Dietrich & Hartlap 2010;Kratochvil et al 2010;Fan et al 2010;Yang et al 2011;Maturi et al 2011;Hamana et al 2012;Hilbert et al 2012;Marian et al 2012Marian et al , 2013Shan et al 2014Shan et al , 2018Lin & Kilbinger 2015;Martinet et al 2015Martinet et al , 2018Liu et al 2015a,b;Kacprzak et al 2016;Petri et al 2016;Zorrilla Matilla et al 2016;Giocoli et al 2018;Peel et al 2018;Davies et al 2019;Fong et al 2019;Li et al 2019;Weiss et al 2019;Yuan et al 2019;Coulton et al 2020;Ajani et al 2020;Zürcher et al 2021), Minkowski functionals (e.g., Kratochvil et al 2012;Petri et al 2015;Vicinanza et al 2019;Parroni et al 2020;Zürcher et al 2021), higher-order moments (e.g., Van Waerbeke et al 2013;Petri et al 2015;Peel et al 2018;Vicinanza et al 2018;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, these nonGaussian estimators are difficult to predict theoretically because of limits in our understanding of the nonlinear growth of structures (see e.g., Fan et al 2010;Lin & Kilbinger 2015;Shan et al 2018;Giocoli et al 2018a; Barthelemy et al 2021, for some attempts) and are instead modeled with N-body simulations. This can significantly increase the computational cost of such analyses, but resorting to N-body simulations is also necessary to accurately model the γ-2PCF at scales affected by nonlinearities (e.g., Euclid Collaboration 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%