2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11464-014-0358-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak Galerkin finite element method for valuation of American options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we mainly introduce the optimal exercise boundary of American options. A derivation of this part can be found in [35]. For completeness, we outline the main process as follows.…”
Section: The Optimal Exercise Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we mainly introduce the optimal exercise boundary of American options. A derivation of this part can be found in [35]. For completeness, we outline the main process as follows.…”
Section: The Optimal Exercise Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the closed-form solution for pricing options is not available due to the complexity and diversity of their structures. Therefore, one needs to approximate the solution using numerical methods, such as Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) [2,3], the lattice method [4], the finite difference method (FDM) [5][6][7], finite element method [8,9], or finite volume method [10] for the Black-Scholes (BS) equation. MCS has the advantage of a lower calculation cost and less dependence on dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the spatial discretization of the PIDE typically a traditional finite difference method (FDM) is applied as in [6,26,27,39,40] or a finite element method (FEM) as in [20,29,49] for the PDE case or a finite volume method as in [48,18]. There are several other numerical methods available in the literature to solve the governing equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%