2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2010.09.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak coupling between sulfate reduction and the anaerobic oxidation of methane in methane-rich seafloor sediments during ex situ incubation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
76
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(95 reference statements)
7
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Substantial AOM rates were sustained across a range of in situ temperatures and seasons (Supplementary Table 1). Surprisingly, AOM rates in the sediments and peat are comparable to those reported for deep-sea methane seeps 22 and coastal marine sediments 7 . These in vitro rate measurements provide some of the first concrete evidence of AOM in FWW 9 ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Substantial AOM rates were sustained across a range of in situ temperatures and seasons (Supplementary Table 1). Surprisingly, AOM rates in the sediments and peat are comparable to those reported for deep-sea methane seeps 22 and coastal marine sediments 7 . These in vitro rate measurements provide some of the first concrete evidence of AOM in FWW 9 ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In most samples, SR rates were sufficient to support AOM; SR in excess of AOM was likely fuelled through hydrogenotrophic or heterotrophic mechanisms 34 . Previous studies compared the magnitude of AOM and SR rates to determine how closely the two processes are coupled 22,35 . At depth (49 cm) in Georgia sediments, AOM rates were significantly (Po0.05) higher than SR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfatereduction rates determined at such sites often exceeded the rates attributed to anaerobic oxidation of methane by several fold (Bowles et al, 2011), and have been proposed to be due to oxidation of hydrocarbons other than methane, including shortchain alkanes Kallmeyer and Boetius 2004;Orcutt et al, 2005Orcutt et al, , 2010Niemann et al, 2006;Kleindienst et al, 2012). Propane-and butane-degrading sulfate reducers may contribute significantly to the excess sulfate-reduction rates, and could have an important role for the in situ carbon and sulfur cycling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These samples from MC118 reflected the natural pelagic background seep community that is endemic to this area where the deepwater hydrocarbon plume dispersed some 6-8 weeks later. In general, MC118 seeps are characterized by natural gas and oil discharge, chemosynthetic communities including Beggiatoa (Lloyd et al, 2010), methane-ice worms, and chemosymbiotic mussels and clams, indicating high hydrocarbon fluxes and high background rates of microbial activity (Bowles et al 2011).…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%