2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/384108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak Convergence Theorems for Strictly Pseudocontractive Mappings and Generalized Mixed Equilibrium Problems

Abstract: We introduce a new iterative method for finding a common element of the set of fixed points of a strictly pseudocontractive mapping, the set of solutions of a generalized mixed equilibrium problem, and the set of solutions of a variational inequality problem for an inverse-strongly-monotone mapping in Hilbert spaces and then show that the sequence generated by the proposed iterative scheme converges weakly to a common element of the above three sets under suitable control conditions. The results in this paper … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) For finding a common element of GM EP (Θ, ϕ, B) ∩ V I(C, F ) ∩ F ix(T ), where B is a continuous monotone mapping, F is a continuous monotone mapping, and T is a continuous pseudocontractive mapping, Theorem 3.1 is a new ones different from previous those introduced by several authors. Consequently, in the sense that our convergence is for the more general class of continuous monotone and continuous pseudocontractive mappings, our results improve, develop and complement the corresponding results, which were obtained recently by several authors in references; for example, see [5,18,25,29,31] and references therein.…”
Section: By Step 3 Andsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1) For finding a common element of GM EP (Θ, ϕ, B) ∩ V I(C, F ) ∩ F ix(T ), where B is a continuous monotone mapping, F is a continuous monotone mapping, and T is a continuous pseudocontractive mapping, Theorem 3.1 is a new ones different from previous those introduced by several authors. Consequently, in the sense that our convergence is for the more general class of continuous monotone and continuous pseudocontractive mappings, our results improve, develop and complement the corresponding results, which were obtained recently by several authors in references; for example, see [5,18,25,29,31] and references therein.…”
Section: By Step 3 Andsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Recently, many authors have introduced some iterative algorithms for finding a common element of the set of the solutions of the GMEP, the GEP, the MEP, the EP, and the VIP and the set of fixed points of a countable family of nonexpansive mappings, and have proved strong convergence of the sequences generated by the proposed iterative algorithms; see [6,13,15,17,25,26,27,29,30,31,32] and the references therein. Also we refer to [4,5,7,18,21] for the GMEP, the GEP, the EP, and the VIP combined with the fixed point problem for nonexpansive semigroups and strictly pseudocontractrive mappings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2012, Jung [16] considered an iterative method for GMEP (1.1) related to a β-inverse-strongly monotone mapping B, the VIP (1.5) for an α-inverse-strongly monotone mapping and k-strictly pseudocontractive mapping T and proved weak convergence to a point w ∈ GMEP(Θ, ϕ, B) ∩ VI(C, F) ∩ Fix(T ). In 2015 Jung [17] also proposed an iterative method for GMEP (1.1) related to a continuous monotone mapping B, the VIP (1.5) for a continuous monotone mapping F and a continuous pseudocontractive mapping T and proved weak convergence to a point w ∈ GMEP(Θ, ϕ, B) ∩ VI(C, F) ∩ Fix(T ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%