2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13660-017-1397-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak convergence theorem for a class of split variational inequality problems and applications in a Hilbert space

Abstract: In this paper, we consider the algorithm proposed in recent years by Censor, Gibali and Reich, which solves split variational inequality problem, and Korpelevich’s extragradient method, which solves variational inequality problems. As our main result, we propose an iterative method for finding an element to solve a class of split variational inequality problems under weaker conditions and get a weak convergence theorem. As applications, we obtain some new weak convergence theorems by using our weak convergence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, motivated by the results announced in Censor et al [3], we propose an extragradient and a modified extragradient iterative algorithms, and prove strong convergence theorems in a real Hilbert space. Our theorems improve and complement the related results in Censor et al [3], Tian and Jiang [19]. We present numerical experiments to illustrate the convergence of our algorithms.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, motivated by the results announced in Censor et al [3], we propose an extragradient and a modified extragradient iterative algorithms, and prove strong convergence theorems in a real Hilbert space. Our theorems improve and complement the related results in Censor et al [3], Tian and Jiang [19]. We present numerical experiments to illustrate the convergence of our algorithms.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Assume that D ⊂ C i n for some n ≥ 1. Let u ∈ D. By a similar argument as in Claim 1 of Theorem 3.1, we obtain that 19) which implies that D ⊂ C i n+1 . Hence,…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations