1994
DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176325383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak Convergence of Randomly Weighted Dependent Residual Empiricals with Applications to Autoregression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
54
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(His assumption that f is almost everywhere positive can be omitted). See also Koul and Ossiander (1994), Koul (2002) and Koul and Ling (2006). We therefore have the following result.…”
Section: Conditional Distribution Functionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…(His assumption that f is almost everywhere positive can be omitted). See also Koul and Ossiander (1994), Koul (2002) and Koul and Ling (2006). We therefore have the following result.…”
Section: Conditional Distribution Functionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…n is a weighted absolute empirical distribution function similar to those studied by Koul and Ossiander (1994). When also b = 0 then b G 1;0 n equals the empirical distribution function b G n of (2.7).…”
Section: Absolute Empirical Process Representationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It is useful to consider an auxiliary class of weighted and marked empirical distribution functions for errors " i as opposed to absolute errors j" i j: The analysis of this class generalises that of Koul and Ossiander (1994) in two respects. First, the standardised estimation error b is permitted to diverge at a rate of n 1=4 rather than being bounded.…”
Section: A Class Of Auxiliary Weighted and Marked Empirical Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results in the previous section were based on the properties of weighted empirical processes constructed from residuals whose distance from the true innovations is in…nitesimal uniformly in t, in probability. This is analogous to the setup of Koul and Ossiander (1994). Here, however, under our hypotheses on@ @, it need not hold that max t=1;:::;T j y t 1 j = o (b T ), so max t=1;:::;T j ŷ t uy t 1 " t j need not be o P (1) even if the true value u = d 1 T c is inserted (in fact, it is not o P (1) if@ is the OLS estimator).…”
Section: Extension To Higher-order Autoregressionsmentioning
confidence: 91%