2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2008.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak complicial sets I. Basic homotopy theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extra material has been added in more recent versions, and proofs simplified, including some for which thanks are due to a referee. Many of the results make striking analogies with more recent results of Verity, [19,20]. His work also contains a separate analysis of ordinal subdivision in strict ω-categories and elsewhere, results from this current paper are linked with an analysis of shuffles in his context.…”
Section: Definitionssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extra material has been added in more recent versions, and proofs simplified, including some for which thanks are due to a referee. Many of the results make striking analogies with more recent results of Verity, [19,20]. His work also contains a separate analysis of ordinal subdivision in strict ω-categories and elsewhere, results from this current paper are linked with an analysis of shuffles in his context.…”
Section: Definitionssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This, in turn, links with the emerging theory of quasicategories, cf. Joyal [13] and Verity's theory of (weak) complicial sets [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This started with Street's proposal in [201], of a definition of weak n-category as a simplicial set satisfying a certain variant of the Kan condition where one takes into account the directions of arrows, and also using the idea of "thinness". His suggestion, in retrospect undoubtedly somewhat similar to Joyal's iteration of the notion of quasicategory, wasn't worked out at the time, but has recieved renewed interest, see Verity [212] for example.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first would seem to be a Kan complex, whilst the second is a 'weak Kan complex' or 'quasi-category', cf. the papers by Joyal, [30], on quasi-categories, and Verity on complicial sets [31][32][33], which are models for weak infinity categories. (For an introduction to some of the types of weak infinity category including quasi-categories and information on the weakening of S-categories, known as Segal categories, the reader is referred to the notes, [34].…”
Section: Now We Have It What Can We Do With It?mentioning
confidence: 99%