1993
DOI: 10.2307/2160321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak Compactness in L 1 (μ, X)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Let φ : T → 2 X be an integrably bounded correspondence with weakly compact values, and let 5 S 1 φ = {f ∈ L 1 (μ, X) : f is a selection of φ}. Since φ has weakly compact values and is integrably bounded, it follows from (Diestel et al (1993), Corollary 2.6) that S 1 φ is weakly relatively compact in L 1 (μ, X). Hence T φ dμ is weakly relatively compact in X (since the operator f → T f dμ from L 1 (μ, X) to X is continuous for the weak topologies of these spaces).…”
Section: Leth Be a T-b(z)-measurable Selection Of ξ And Suppose That mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let φ : T → 2 X be an integrably bounded correspondence with weakly compact values, and let 5 S 1 φ = {f ∈ L 1 (μ, X) : f is a selection of φ}. Since φ has weakly compact values and is integrably bounded, it follows from (Diestel et al (1993), Corollary 2.6) that S 1 φ is weakly relatively compact in L 1 (μ, X). Hence T φ dμ is weakly relatively compact in X (since the operator f → T f dμ from L 1 (μ, X) to X is continuous for the weak topologies of these spaces).…”
Section: Leth Be a T-b(z)-measurable Selection Of ξ And Suppose That mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as p → ∞. By theÜlger-Diestel-Ruess-Schachermayer theorem [Ülg91,DRS93], we conclude that ( 1l { hn <n} h n ) is σ(L 1 , L ∞ ) relatively compact.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Comments Propositions 6.4.5-6.4.6 are the analogs for Young measures of thë Ulger-Diestel-Ruess-Schachermayer characterization of weak compactness in L 1 X where X is a Banach space [Ülg91,DRS93]. Namely these authors proved that a bounded uniformly integrable subset H of L 1 X is relatively compact iff ( * ) given any sequence (u n ) n in H, there are v n ∈ co{u m ; m ≥ n} such that the sequence (v n (ω)) n is weakly convergent in X for almost all ω ∈ Ω.…”
Section: Proof 1) Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existence of the sup-bound of g j is ensured because sup a |u i (a, ·)| is integrably bounded. Following Diestel et al [1993], there is a sequence h n ∈ co{y k : k ≥ n} such that h n converges a.e. to y, and hence L(h n ) also converges a.e.…”
Section: R1)mentioning
confidence: 99%