“…First, the generation of the two types of basalts and the tonalite protoliths is possible in nonplate tectonic settings that feature extensive melting and recycling of deeply buried hydrous basalts (see next paragraph, also [Johnson et al., 2017; Pearce & Reagan, 2019; Smithies et al., 2007]). Second, B‐type olivine fabrics, depleted mantle‐like geochemistry, and the coexistence of Ti‐humite and magnesite (Dymek et al., 1988a) may not be discriminating features of subduction zone conditions, as they may be consistent with amphibolite‐grade crustal cumulates (Dymek et al., 1988a; Szilas et al., 2015; Yao et al., 2019). Therefore, existing and new petrological information of the Isua supracrustal rocks can be interpreted as preserving quasi‐uniform, pre‐3.5 Ga amphibolite metamorphism with increasing metasomatic effects toward the northeastern part of the supracrustal belt (Ramírez‐Salazar et al., 2021; Webb et al., 2020).…”