We work with them? Healthcare workers interpretation of organizational relations mined from electronic health records

Abstract

Objective Models of healthcare organizations (HCOs) are often defined up front by a select few administrative officials and managers. However, given the size and complexity of modern healthcare systems, this practice does not scale easily. The goal of this work is to investigate the extent to which organizational relationships can be automatically learned from utilization patterns of electronic health record (EHR) systems. Method We designed an online survey to solicit the perspectives of employees of a large academic medical center. We surveyed employees from two administrative areas: 1) Coding & Charge Entry and 2) Medical Information Services and two clinical areas: 3) Anesthesiology and 4) Psychiatry. To test our hypotheses we selected two administrative units that have work-related responsibilities with electronic records; however, for the clinical areas we selected two disciplines with very different patient responsibilities and whose accesses and people who accessed were similar. We provided each group of employees with questions regarding the chance of interaction between areas in the medical center in the form of association rules (e.g., Given someone from Coding & Charge Entry accessed a patient’s record, what is the chance that someone from Medical Information Services access the same record?). We compared the respondent predictions with the rules learned from actual EHR utilization using linear-mixed effects regression models. Results The findings from our survey confirm that medical center employees can distinguish between association rules of high and non-high likelihood when their own area is involved. Moreover, they can make such distinctions between for any HCO area in this survey. It was further observed that, with respect to highly likely interactions, respondents from certain areas were significantly better than other respondents at making such distinctions and certain areas’ associations were more distinguishable than others. Conclusions These results illustrate that EHR utilization patterns may be consistent with the expectations of HCO employees. Our findings show that certain areas in the HCO are easier than others for employees to assess, which suggests that automated learning strategies may yield more accurate models of healthcare organizations than those based on the perspectives of a select few individuals.

Better Usability and Technical Stability Could Lead to Better Work-Related Well-Being among Physicians

“…EPRs are expected to improve the quality and continuity of care, but they have also changed physicians' workflows, documentation time, and documentation practices. [1][2][3][4] In a study conducted by the American Medical Association (AMA), the introduction of EPR systems impaired physicians' professional satisfaction. 5 This is ascribed to several factors such as poor usability, tedious data entry, interference with direct patient care, inept and less meaningful work content, and an inability to exchange health information.…”

Progress in Biomedical Knowledge Discovery: A 25-year Retrospective

“…Great interest has been devoted also to the management of longitudinal data, with several methodologies centered on the extraction and visualization of temporal patterns [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. These methods were exploited both for clinical applications and for tackling organizational issues [31,32].…”

Leveraging electronic health record documentation for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis team identification

“…Currently, FMEA team members identify providers expected to perform particular workflow activities. However, literature identifies discrepancies between healthcare worker perception of the clinical team and the actual team as recorded in the electronic health record (EHR) 12 , 13 . Additionally, analysis of EHR audit logs identified that clinical providers may overlook the contribution of ancillary medical providers 14 .…”

“…For example, EHRs may aid in identifying people involved in a high-risk process whose perspectives may be overlooked by typical FMEA approaches. As indicated previously, emerging literature highlights EHR’s ability to identify unrealized connections among healthcare teams 12–15 . As providers document their activities in the EHR as part of their daily workflow, the EHR generates metadata including names, titles, times, and activity details.…”