1987
DOI: 10.1080/01619568709538569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“We teach the girlrepression,the boyexpression”:Sexuality, sex equity and education in historical perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critics have argued that the implicit message for girls is one that denies pleasure in sexuality as well as subjectivity. The argument has been that boys are portrayed as sexual subjects, as "expressers" of sexuality, whereas girls are portrayed as recipients or as victims rather than as active sexual agents (Rury, 1989;Whatley, 1989;Fine, 1992). This argument is well taken and will not be reviewed extensively here; but what has received less attention is that the portrayal of boys as sexual agents and pleasure seekers is very limited.…”
Section: The Denial Of Pleasurementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Critics have argued that the implicit message for girls is one that denies pleasure in sexuality as well as subjectivity. The argument has been that boys are portrayed as sexual subjects, as "expressers" of sexuality, whereas girls are portrayed as recipients or as victims rather than as active sexual agents (Rury, 1989;Whatley, 1989;Fine, 1992). This argument is well taken and will not be reviewed extensively here; but what has received less attention is that the portrayal of boys as sexual agents and pleasure seekers is very limited.…”
Section: The Denial Of Pleasurementioning
confidence: 93%