“…Third, we claim that race-neutral and gender-neutral attribution beliefs are aligned with (rather than opposed to) racial stereotypes that make analogous attributions. For example, teachers who agree with ostensibly race-neutral statements (e.g., “Students who struggle to understand mathematics do not study enough.”) may be more likely than others to endorse analogous attributions of success to effort, even when these statements echo racial stereotypes (e.g., “Black students struggle in mathematics because they are lazy,” is an analogous attribution that echoes the racist stereotype “Black people are lazy.”) Building on analyses of “color-blindness,” in which individuals claim to not see race (e.g., Delgado & Stefancic, 2013), and related concepts of “color-evasiveness” (Annamma et al, 2017) and “race-evasiveness” (Chang-Bacon, 2021) in which individuals actively avoid discussing or acknowledging race, we conjecture that both attribution statements reflect the same underlying belief (i.e., the attribution of mathematical excellence to personal characteristics associated with race; c.f., ideology , below). If this conjecture holds, equity in mathematics teaching and learning is likely shaped by teachers’ attribution beliefs.…”