2014
DOI: 10.1177/0956797614532656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

We See More Than We Can Report

Abstract: The distinction between access consciousness and phenomenal consciousness is a subject of intensive debate. According to one view, visual experience overflows the capacity of the attentional and working memory system: We see more than we can report. According to the opposed view, this perceived richness is an illusion-we are aware only of information that we can subsequently report. This debate remains unresolved because of the inevitable reliance on report, which is limited in capacity. To bypass this limitat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
81
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, a recent study claimed that one particular statistic, color diversity, could be perceived ‘cost free’ and required no attention or working-memory resources [8]. Are ensemble statistics and scene representations truly ‘cost free’?…”
Section: Do Observers Have Access To All Of This Information?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a recent study claimed that one particular statistic, color diversity, could be perceived ‘cost free’ and required no attention or working-memory resources [8]. Are ensemble statistics and scene representations truly ‘cost free’?…”
Section: Do Observers Have Access To All Of This Information?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Huang (2015) observed a similar cost of dividing attention between individual objects and perceptual groups, suggesting that statistical properties require as much attention as individual features. At the same time, several studies suggest that a minimal amount of attention spread over the scene is sufficient to process statistical information (Alvarez & Oliva, 2008;Chong & Treisman, 2005a;Joo, Shin, Chong, & Blake, 2009), even when it is not sufficient for conscious awareness of individual features within the set (Ward, Bear, & Scholl, 2016; but see Bronfman, Brezis, Jacobson, & Usher, 2014). This is further supported by clinical studies showing that even patients with unilateral spatial neglect can use information from their neglected visual field when computing statistical information (Pavlovskaya, Soroker, Bonneh, & Hochstein, 2015;Yamanashi Leib, Landau, Baek, Chong, & Robertson, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…One dramatic advance is reported in Bronfman et al [6] that takes advantage of a well-known phenomenon. In a task that demands focal attention, subjects show little or no decrement in performance from a secondary task in which they report 'ensemble properties' or 'gists' concerning items that are not focally attended.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%