2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12126-017-9288-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

We’re told, ‘Suck it up’: Long-Term Care Workers’ Psychological Health and Safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear, that the level of work stress experienced by support workers can have wideranging implications on the healthcare organizations and the quality of care they aim to deliver. However, to our knowledge, no studies have specifically explored the experience of work stress from the perspective of support-workers in a long-term care setting; with recent calls for research addressing this issue (Braedley, Owusu, Przednowek, & Armstrong, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear, that the level of work stress experienced by support workers can have wideranging implications on the healthcare organizations and the quality of care they aim to deliver. However, to our knowledge, no studies have specifically explored the experience of work stress from the perspective of support-workers in a long-term care setting; with recent calls for research addressing this issue (Braedley, Owusu, Przednowek, & Armstrong, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• are mainly middle-aged or older women (66%-71%) (Estabrooks et al 2015b) • are often newcomers or immigrants (60% of care aides working in urban areas), with English as their second language (Chamberlain et al 2019b) • are often not required to complete any continuing education and are often not offered it (Estabrooks et al 2015b) • often work in more than one job (25%-30%) and in health care settings other than nursing homes (e.g., hospitals; 15%) (Estabrooks et al 2015b;Hewko et al 2015;Chamberlain et al 2019b;Song et al 2020a;Van Houtven et al 2020;Yinfei et al 2020) • often work short-staffed (Song et al 2020b) • have insufficient time to complete necessary care tasks and must rush essential care (up to 65% of care aides per shift) (Song et al 2020a) • are at worryingly high risk for burnout and physical injury (Estabrooks et al 2015b;Hewko et al 2015;Chamberlain et al 2017Chamberlain et al , 2019b • report feeling that their work is important and has meaning, despite high levels of work-related stress (Estabrooks et al 2015b;Chamberlain et al 2019b;Song et al 2020b) The impact of COVID-19 on psychological health and safety of direct care workers in nursing homes is being added to already worrisome pre-existing trends (Braedley et al 2018). Studies from the 2003 SARS epidemic (Styr et al 2008) and recent studies documenting effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on point-of-care workers in China (Lai et al 2020b) point to severe long-term traumatic impacts on mental health of point-of-care staff.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These aspects of the work itself make it difficult to demonstrate that workers did not incite the sexual advance in some way. Indeed, research suggests that managers may blame care workers for residents’ sexual advances and that workers generally feel unsupported by management when it comes to addressing harassment from residents (Braedley, Owusu, Przednowek, & Armstrong, 2017; Daly et al, 2011; Morgan et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%