‘We’re all on the path ourselves’: The ‘reflective practitioner’ in participatory arts with older people

Abstract

This article explores the role of the ‘reflective practitioner’ in participatory arts projects with older people, as articulated by creative practitioners themselves. Research into participatory arts activity with older people, which focuses on the process rather than the outcome of such activity remains sparse, as does scholarship that engages closely with artist-practitioners themselves as a rich source of knowledge and insight in this field. Supported by theory concerning the development and utility of reflective praxis, the article foregrounds the perspectives of a range of experienced artist-practitioners, as obtained through interviews and the findings of a ‘reflective learning group’ practitioner CPD programme. Research found that the creative practitioners consulted had developed a range of diverse reflective practices in order to engage and nurture the older participants they worked with, including: highly flexible and dialogic approaches; seeking ‘kinaesthetic empathy’ with participants; applying a form of ‘micro-responsiveness’ to participants; and fostering strong reflective practices among participants themselves. These findings hold important implications as to how we understand the processes by which practitioners enhance participant experience in the participatory arts, how creative practitioners are best supported in their work, and for the design, management and evaluation of participatory arts projects.

The aesthetic, artistic and creative contributions of dance for health and wellbeing across the lifecourse: a systematic review

“…Alongside this are calls to offer both dance artists (with all their embodied expertise to analyse and interpret movement-based developments) and participants roles beyond the passive and to engage them, and their embodied voice, more in research data collection and protocols (Zeilig et al, 2019 ), also connecting to efforts to move beyond a cognitive emphasis. These perspectives from review papers reflect a move in wider arts for health research towards using arts approaches (Fraser & Sayah, 2011 ), and new approaches (Choo et al, 2019 ) including philosophical analysis techniques in the vein of the rhizomatic approach of Deleuze and Guattari (e.g., Atkinson & Scott, 2015 ) and valuing practitioner reflective practices focused on elements like dialogic, kinaesthetic empathy (Wakeling, 2014 ).…”

How participatory arts can contribute to Dutch older adults’ wellbeing – revisiting a taxonomy of arts interventions for people with dementia

“…This growing international arts and health field is characterized by a dominant focus on outcomes, effects and impact studies while the mechanisms that underlie the effects of art activities often remain understudied (i.a. Bradfield, 2020 ; Daykin, 2019 ; Dunphy et al, 2019 ; Matarasso, 2019 ; Wakeling, 2014 ). Regarding terminology, processes and mechanisms through which benefits of art activities may occur, seem to be used interchangeably.…”