“We need to talk about what race feels like!” Using memory work to analyse the production of race and ethnicity in research encounters

Abstract

This article is about the production of race and ethnicity in research encounters. It is based on a type of retrospective, comparative memory work, through which we analyse, compare and contrast our respective experiences of moments when race and ethnicity have been produced during our interactions with research participants. We suggest that adding memory work to the analysis of research experiences is one way of exposing the production of race and ethnicity in research interactions, and that a comparative approach to memory work can help clarify how positionalities may not always be good predictors of processes of racialisation in research situations. We also suggest that by looking for instances in which we have felt (or been made to feel) our own 'difference' or 'sameness', power or a sense disorientation, we may contribute to destabilising the categories and categorisations, which might otherwise go unquestioned in research encounters. Our analysis makes clear how we cannot assume any fixation of where, in whom, or in which topics race or ethnicity is located. We suggest that memory work is a useful tool for learning about the production of race and ethnicity, and comparative or contrastive memory work in collaboration with other researchers differently positioned from oneself is a useful approach when engaging in 'researching differences'.Please cite this article as: kennedy-macfoy, m. and Pristed Nielsen, H. (2012). "We need to talk about what race feels like!" Using memory work to analyse the production of race and ethnicity in research encounters. Qualitative Studies, 3(2): 133-149.

Race, Fitness-to-Practice and the Experience of Trainee Educators

“…It considers participant memory as subjective and reconstructed, influenced by an adherence to or a rejection of dominant ideologies. (Berg, 2008;Kennedy-Macfoy & Nielsen, 2012). In this study, the oppressive ideology would be whiteness.…”

“Eastern European”, Yes, but How? Autoethnographic Accounts of Differentiated Whiteness

“…In Nordic feminist-inspired research, a growing body of scholarship is investigating processes of racialisation through autoethnography and memory work (Ahlstedt, 2015;Andreassen & Ahmed-Andresen, 2014;Andreassen & Myong, 2017;Berg, 2008;kennedy-macfoy & Nielsen, 2012;Khawaja & Mørck, 2009;Koobak & Thapar-Björkert, 2012;Lapiņa, 2018;Mainsah & Prøitz, 2015). This article contributes to these studies by examining the intersecting markers of difference regarding the emergence of differentiated whiteness as it manifests in our migrant researcher positionalities.…”

Sexual Harassment or Volunteer Work?

“…Memory work involves writing down personal experiences that are related to the research topic (Berg, 2008). In the past decade, memory work has been used to examine how racialisation matters in research encounters and knowledge production, and how particular encounters testify to politics of race (Berg, 2008;Kennedy-Macfoy and Nielsen, 2012;Andreassen and Myong, 2017). Prior to writing this article, I have used memory work to revisit and write down episodes and feelings that denoted my position as a migrant in my first years in Denmark, including my meeting with Ole in 2004.…”