2015
DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2015.1094113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘We need to get together and make ourselves heard’: everyday online spaces as incubators of political action

Abstract: This article examines to what extent, and how, people engaging in political talk within 'non-political' discussion forums -online lifestyle 15 communities -leads to political (or personal) action or calls-toaction. The analysis is framed in the context of wider questions of citizenship, civic engagement and political mobilization. To capture everyday political talk amongst citizens requires us to move beyond the now widely analysed online spaces of formal politics. Instead, we focus on online third spaces conc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
27
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the described shortfalls of discussion forums which can often be observed concerning quality and the culture of discourse, positive examples can also be found. According to the results of an analysis of three UK-based discussion forums from 2010 to 2014, Graham et al (2016) claim that political actions can in some instances be cultivated in third spaces, such as online lifestyle community spaces. In order for political action to follow up on online discussions, the following factors are identified: a helpful and supportive culture or structure, framing topics in a personal manner or in connection to everyday life and communicating in an interactive and reciprocal community or platform.…”
Section: E-deliberationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the described shortfalls of discussion forums which can often be observed concerning quality and the culture of discourse, positive examples can also be found. According to the results of an analysis of three UK-based discussion forums from 2010 to 2014, Graham et al (2016) claim that political actions can in some instances be cultivated in third spaces, such as online lifestyle community spaces. In order for political action to follow up on online discussions, the following factors are identified: a helpful and supportive culture or structure, framing topics in a personal manner or in connection to everyday life and communicating in an interactive and reciprocal community or platform.…”
Section: E-deliberationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….] the importance of political talk for triggering both manifest and latent political participation" (Graham et al 2016(Graham et al : 1383. Dunne (2015) examined 138 online forums dedicated to local politics regarding their impact and found none on direct democracy, as none of these forums provided any voting mechanism.…”
Section: E-deliberationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While online spaces may be seen as facilitating somewhat more communitarian participation, co-ordinating campaigns and bring people together for common purposes, in terms of the political action they foster it is often single issue in nature, again reflecting consumer forms of politics, and in many cases they do little more than provide guidance on how individuals can contact politicians or 163 Graham et al, 2015, pp.7-8 164 Graham et al, 2015, p.8 165 Graham et al, 2015, p.11 166 Graham et al, 2015 Hansard Society, 2017, p.43 168 Hansard Society, 2013, p.38 169 Baker et al, 2013 170 Baker et al, 2013, pp.29-32 engage with the State and civil society directly themselves. As such, the digital citizen ultimately still fulfils a largely liberal individualist role (and even boycotting, a form of collective rather than individual action, is politics through consumer choice-making 171 ).…”
Section: Active Digital Citizenshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Fuchs, 2014b, p. 254) The creation of SNSs has led to what has been coined networked publics (boyd, 2011) describing the ways in which people use internet technology to gather for personal, professional and political reasons, to seek information and for civic engagement (De Zuniga & Valenzuela, 2011;Graham et al, 2015). Social networking sites share a similar function to real world meeting spaces, for example cafés or workplaces (Varnelis & Friedberg, 2008).…”
Section: Social Networking Sites and Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of social media offers the public new ways to create and maintain relationships, to share information and to collaborate (Graham, Jackson, & Wright, 2015;Sage & Sage, 2016). Social networking sites provide internet-based services that allow people to engage with social media in a unique way: to construct a digital identity and connect socially without barriers of time or space (Fuchs, 2014a;Steinfield, Ellison, & Lampe, 2008).…”
Section: Social Networking Sites and Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%