2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

We Need Better Figures!

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In retrospect, we can see that this influential study suffered from several methodological problems related to statistical analysis and reporting practice for harm-related data (9). The most serious systematic error was that data for the total number of patients with central lesions included in the study were not shown in the text and not available from the Kaplan-Meier figure. In the statistical analysis of 2 year freedom from severe toxicity, the study did not distinguish between patients with a single grade 3 to 5 toxicity and those with multiple grade 3 to 5 toxicities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In retrospect, we can see that this influential study suffered from several methodological problems related to statistical analysis and reporting practice for harm-related data (9). The most serious systematic error was that data for the total number of patients with central lesions included in the study were not shown in the text and not available from the Kaplan-Meier figure. In the statistical analysis of 2 year freedom from severe toxicity, the study did not distinguish between patients with a single grade 3 to 5 toxicity and those with multiple grade 3 to 5 toxicities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%