2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2011.05.009
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘We had lighter tongues’: Making and mediating Gullah/Geechee personhood in the South Carolina Lowcountry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each publication, we analyzed nine research questions that were formulated in terms of our research objectives: (1) In which year was the publication published? (2) What is the format of the publication? (3) What is the name of the journal?…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For each publication, we analyzed nine research questions that were formulated in terms of our research objectives: (1) In which year was the publication published? (2) What is the format of the publication? (3) What is the name of the journal?…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gullah cultural heritage is described as both tangible and intangible, including topics such as fishing culture (e.g., [22]), basket-making traditions (e.g., [5,23]), folk telling (e.g., [24][25][26]), conflict resolution (e.g., [25]), the marketplace (e.g., [27]), and cultural aspects of pregnancy (e.g., [28]). Language studies mainly focused on Gullah language distinctiveness, tracing the roots of this rich language and the current threats to its survival (e.g., [2,[29][30][31]). Most of the social science publications employed a qualitative research method (n = 59, 89%), while few used mixed (n = 5, 8%) or quantitative methods (n = 2, 3%).…”
Section: General Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finding that contradictory forces can occur together and proceed through dialectical relation in language revitalization more broadly is echoed in McEwan‐Fujita's (2011) analysis of denigrating versus redemptive discourses about Gaelic in Scotland from the 18th to 20th centuries. Likewise, Smalls (2012) looks at how two competing institutional ideologies of Gullah language in the Carolinas have historically phased into multiple tracks for the revitalization of Gullah selfhood.…”
Section: Indigeneity and The Artifactualization Of Vanishing Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is only further complicated by Gullah Geechee's relationship to covert and overt prestige, where the language has been historically marginalized by outsiders and acts as symbol of resilient identity for its community (Cooper 2017), but also diachronically fractally recursive within the community as an 'inferior' way of speaking in terms of social mobility and opportunity (Mufwene 1993). Contemporary attitudes towards the language from both within and outside the community have pointed towards a cultural and linguistic 'renaissance', where the language is appreciated in more visible intercommunity contexts and as an emblem of authenticated community belonging (Hamilton 2012;Smalls 2012); however, the language is still constricted in many ways by hegemonic and raciolinguistic (Rosa and Flores 2017) norms of 'appropriateness', where its value is curated by outsider perceptions of what it 'should' sound like, how, when, and where it 'should' be used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%