2020
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

We are in This Together: Promoting Health Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Tobacco Research for Sexual and Gender Minority Populations

Abstract: Introduction Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals have higher tobacco use prevalence and consequently higher burden of tobacco-caused diseases, including cancer and cardiovascular disease compared with their heterosexual or cisgender counterparts. Yet, there is a critical gap in research focused on measuring SGM tobacco-related health disparities and addressing unmet needs of SGM individuals in the context of nicotine and tobacco research. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research using nationally representative, disaggregated data is necessary to examine if the trends observed in this study persist across distinct sexual identities relative to heterosexual counterparts. Notably, even existing national surveys continue to inadequately or inconsistently collect and report respondent sexual identity, which underscores a need for improved sampling and outreach efforts that produce more representative datasets (Dermody et al, 2020). Though not the purpose of this study, future research investigating possible differences in tobacco product use between gender minority (i.e., individuals whose gender identity may include but is not limited to trans, non-binary, gender non-conforming, two-spirit, and/or genderqueer) adolescents and their cisgender counterparts also is needed.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research using nationally representative, disaggregated data is necessary to examine if the trends observed in this study persist across distinct sexual identities relative to heterosexual counterparts. Notably, even existing national surveys continue to inadequately or inconsistently collect and report respondent sexual identity, which underscores a need for improved sampling and outreach efforts that produce more representative datasets (Dermody et al, 2020). Though not the purpose of this study, future research investigating possible differences in tobacco product use between gender minority (i.e., individuals whose gender identity may include but is not limited to trans, non-binary, gender non-conforming, two-spirit, and/or genderqueer) adolescents and their cisgender counterparts also is needed.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseline survey collected information on demographic characteristics, use of alcohol and electronic cigarettes, and smoking history and current smoking behaviors, including the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence score [ 11 ]. To assess sexual and gender minority identity, we used 3 items based on consensus recommendations [ 12 - 14 ]. Two gender minority items focused on sex and gender identity: “What was your assigned sex at birth, on your original birth certificate?” (response options: male, female); “What is your current gender identity (check all that apply)?” (response options: man/male, woman/female, trans male/trans man, trans female/trans woman, genderqueer/gender nonconforming, different identity, not sure).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseline survey collected information on demographic characteristics, use of alcohol and electronic cigarettes, and smoking history and current smoking behaviors, including the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence score [11]. To assess sexual and gender minority identity, we used 3 items based on consensus recommendations [12][13][14]. Two gender minority items focused on sex and gender identity: "What was your assigned sex at birth, on your original birth certificate?"…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the need for brevity where SGM status is not a major focus of the study, there are practical suggestions for implementing these guidelines broadly in TUD treatment research. See Figure 1 for domains and sample question wording, 21…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%