2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

We and they: Animal welfare in the era of advanced agricultural biotechnology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In relation to the losses due to the deaths of pets, there is currently a period of humanization of companion animals [ 24 ]. Symptoms of grief with pets increase in proportion when they coincide with stressful life events [ 25 ], which could explain why during the COVID-19 pandemic, pets have been identified as more anxiety-inducing than in normal situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to the losses due to the deaths of pets, there is currently a period of humanization of companion animals [ 24 ]. Symptoms of grief with pets increase in proportion when they coincide with stressful life events [ 25 ], which could explain why during the COVID-19 pandemic, pets have been identified as more anxiety-inducing than in normal situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other GM approaches which involve manipulation or alteration of genes may enable the development of new lines which are more productive, able to digest lower quality foods without adverse effects, resistant to common pests and diseases, or have specific genetic disorders or predispositions removed entirely from the genome. However GM technology still carries considerable risks in that the process of insertion of genes is not perfect and the outcome often uncertain (as demonstrated by the case of the Beltsville pigs in the US in 1985), which can result in further adverse welfare issues for the animal as well as incurring additional costs (Christiansen & Sandoe, 2000;Pascalev, 2006). The impact of alteration of the gene pool through removal or addition of specific genes also has to be considered as a sustainability issue.…”
Section: Issues For the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not least among the arguments presented in relation to the application of genomic technologies are those related to ethical issues, which may apply to consideration of the negative or positive impacts of genomic technologies on animal welfare (Pascalev 2006;Palmer 2012), economic factors such as impacts on the livelihoods of primary producers who adopt or do not adopt genomics utilised in animal breeding (Menozzi et al, 2012), or societal concerns about risks to human or animal health, the environment, or consumer choice regarding the products of such technologies (e.g. see inter alia Kaiser, 2005;Frewer et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My personal belief is that Homo sapiens sapiens had a special path in evolution, making him superior to the other animals (according to Bible he was created "in the image and likeness of God"). For this reason, I agree that, as animals have a certain capacity for suffering, they should be entitled to some rights, which are, however, subordinate to human rights (Warren, 1983; cited by Pascalev, 2006). In fact, most Western nations have promulgated laws and followed policies that acknowledge the sentient nature of animals, their capacity to experience pain, their awareness of themselves and their environment, and the need and obligation on the part of humans to treat animals (including farm animals) in a respectful and humane way (Pascalev, 2006).…”
Section: Prefacementioning
confidence: 99%