1997
DOI: 10.1006/jfan.1996.2986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelets and the Angle between Past and Future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
131
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
131
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In general though, it is important to realise that these reducing operators for p = 2 are not averages. Despite this, it is nonetheless very useful to think of them as appropriate averages of W , which is further justified by the following simple but important result proved in [25] when p = 2 and proved in [13] for general 1 < p < ∞.…”
Section: Two Weight Characterization Of Paraproductsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general though, it is important to realise that these reducing operators for p = 2 are not averages. Despite this, it is nonetheless very useful to think of them as appropriate averages of W , which is further justified by the following simple but important result proved in [25] when p = 2 and proved in [13] for general 1 < p < ∞.…”
Section: Two Weight Characterization Of Paraproductsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we will see later, this translates into a matrix Fefferman-Kenig-Pipher and Buckley condition on matrix A 2 weights W . Note that while the former is well known in the matrix setting (see [6,25]), the latter is to the author's knowledge new.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [15] for a similar notion of matrix weights. We will now find a characterization of such functions F in terms of the boundedness of certain averaging operators on the function space L 2 (F * F ).…”
Section: Definition 33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An n × n matrix weight almost everywhere positive on the real line will be denoted by w 2 (x), x ∈ R. Further, by M 2 n we denote the class of matrix weights w 2 satisfying Muckenhoupt's condition (A 2 ) [2]: sup…”
Section: To the Centenary Of M G Kreinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning ([3, p. 310]; [6, p. 91]) that for each antidissipative Volterra operator B with trivial kernel and n-dimensional imaginary part there exists a matrix function θ ∈ J n (the characteristic matrix function of B * ) such that B is unitarily equivalent to an operator of the form (2), (3). Further, for each weight V 2 ∈ M 2 n there exists a matrix function V + (respectively, V − ) that is outer [3] in C + (respectively, C − ) and satisfies [2] …”
Section: To the Centenary Of M G Kreinmentioning
confidence: 99%