2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2004.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet transforms and edge detectors on digital images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3c ). Since pixel gray levels were found to vary considerably within the same fascicle (appearing not completely connected together in the location plane but being separated by many voids and discontinuities), the fascicle edges cannot be directly extracted by using the existing edge detection operator method or region growing method 15 16 17 . To be able to automatically extract fascicle edges, these voids and discontinuities have to be excluded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3c ). Since pixel gray levels were found to vary considerably within the same fascicle (appearing not completely connected together in the location plane but being separated by many voids and discontinuities), the fascicle edges cannot be directly extracted by using the existing edge detection operator method or region growing method 15 16 17 . To be able to automatically extract fascicle edges, these voids and discontinuities have to be excluded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, since pixel gray levels vary considerably within the same fascicle (being separated by many voids and discontinuities), edges of the nerve fascicles cannot be obtained directly by adopting some existing methods, e.g. edge detection operator method and region growth method 15 16 17 . Here, after testing with the classical GVF-Snake model with normal and tangent energy part, it was found that the model can be simplified because the tangent energy part is nearly zero while the edge is enveloping the fascicle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many groups have examined multiscale wavelet transform for edge detection [3][4][5] . Computational complexity of the wavelet transform is low and its denoise ability is strong, so we choose the wavelet transform to detect edge width of objects in the image [6,7] .…”
Section: Detecting Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wavelet transform provides a natural window for signals that requires high time resolution at high frequencies and high frequency resolution at low frequencies based on the dilation property of a wavelet and does not require preselecting a time window, which is essential in STFT (Sinha et al, 2009). The instantaneous attributes obtained by wavelet analysis have certain effects on the analysis of non-stationary signals such as edge detection (see, for example, Aydin et al, 1996;Schmeelk, 2005) and image compression (see, for example, Lewis and Knowles, 1992;Boix and Cantó, 2010), the time-frequency distribution in time series (see, for example, Farge, 1992), fault diagnosis (see, for example, Jena and Panigrahi, 2012) and lithological characteristics identification (see, for example, Perez-Muñoz et al, 2013) and gas detection(see, for example, Kazemeini et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%