IMTC/99. Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (Cat. No.99CH36309)
DOI: 10.1109/imtc.1999.776987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet-transform-based method of analysis for Lamb-wave ultrasonic NDE signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Presence of cracks, delaminations or other defects will alter the shape of the wave produced by the PZT sensor with respect to a damage-free condition. Thus, it is possible to monitor the structure health condition by analyzing the differences between the two waves [1] [16]. An example of this is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Shm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence of cracks, delaminations or other defects will alter the shape of the wave produced by the PZT sensor with respect to a damage-free condition. Thus, it is possible to monitor the structure health condition by analyzing the differences between the two waves [1] [16]. An example of this is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Shm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For nonstationary ultrasonic signals, WT outperforms FT due to its ability to adapt the window size of the processed signal. Therefore, one can easily separate information and noise without needing a complex windowing step [15]. However, the main shortcoming of WT is that the time localization is poor for low frequency signals and the frequency resolution is poor for high frequency signals.…”
Section: The Basic Principle Of Emdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth to mention that, in the most general case where e n (t) and e p (t) are taken into account simultaneously, one should first try to remove almost completely e n (t) and then apply more sophisticated denoising methods (wavelet filtering, independent component analysis, etc. [8,27,40]) to optimally separate the desired signal components from the unwanted one e p (t).…”
Section: A Minimal Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%