2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet packet transform for detection of single events in acoustic emission signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to approach these mechanisms in micro-scale [5], more sophisticated analytical methods have been developed, allowing for clustering of AE signals and their pattern recognition [6]. Many authors use wavelet transform for more detailed damage identification and localization [7]. Due to time/frequency uncertainty [3] precise definition of the time of occurrence of specific damage process described by acoustic emission is difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to approach these mechanisms in micro-scale [5], more sophisticated analytical methods have been developed, allowing for clustering of AE signals and their pattern recognition [6]. Many authors use wavelet transform for more detailed damage identification and localization [7]. Due to time/frequency uncertainty [3] precise definition of the time of occurrence of specific damage process described by acoustic emission is difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bartlett's theory [7,43] mentioned that if a neural network is used for a pattern recognition problem, the smaller size of weights brings a smaller square error during the training process, and then realizes a better generalization performance, which doesn't relate directly to the number of nodes. In order to reach smaller training error, the smaller the norms of weights tend to have a better generalization performance.…”
Section: Elm For Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data processing method simplifies the computational expense and benefits the improvement of the generation performance. Some typical feature extraction methods, such as wavelet packet transform (WPT) [7][8][9][10], empirical mode decomposition (EMD) [11], time-domain statistical features (TDSF) [12,13] and independent component analysis (ICA) [14][15][16][17] have been proved to be equivalent to a large-scale matrix factorization problem (i.e., there may be still some irrelevant or redundant noise in the extracted features) [18]. In order to resolve this problem, a feature selection method could be employed to wipe off irrelevant and redundant information so that the dimension of extracted feature is reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, TOA-based techniques require a relatively large number of receiver transducers measuring the coherent part of the wave field (ballistic wave). Advanced signal processing methods such as peak detection (Castro et al, 2018;Das and Leung, 2018;Zhou et al, 2019), cross-correlation (Kim et al, 2015;Li et al, 2018), Hilbert (Chen et al, 2018;Kim and Yuan, 2018), and wavelet transformation (Bianchi et al, 2015;Zhu et al, 2017) have been employed to extract physical parameters from measured data in order detect AE waves. Nevertheless, the dispersive nature of guided waves, as well as boundary reflections and mode conversion in geometrically complex components can all alter the acquired signal resulting in incorrect TOA estimations (Ciampa and Meo, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%