2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-017-1440-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet frame-based image restoration using sparsity, nonlocal, and support prior of frame coefficients

Abstract: The wavelet frame systems have been widely investigated and applied for image restoration and many other image processing problems over the past decades, attributing to their good capability of sparsely approximating piece-wise smooth functions such as images. Most wavelet frame based models exploit the l 1 norm of frame coefficients for a sparsity constraint in the past. The authors in [50,17] proposed an l 0 minimization model, where the l 0 norm of wavelet frame coefficients is penalized instead, and have d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two-dimensional fused lasso (Friedman et al, 2007) and the graphical lasso (Friedman et al, 2008) are penalized regression methods that account for spatial structure in the signal using penalties to encourage spatial smoothness. Spatial wavelet shrinkage methods impose a threshold on coefficients in the wavelet domain to recover a sparse signal (Donoho and Johnstone, 1994;Taswell, 2000;Jansen, 2001;Yadav et al, 2014;He and Xiang, 2017). These regularization methods can be applied to high-dimensional data, but require presetting the tuning parameters via cross validation (Mallick and Yi, 2013) and fail to account for all sources of uncertainty.…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-dimensional fused lasso (Friedman et al, 2007) and the graphical lasso (Friedman et al, 2008) are penalized regression methods that account for spatial structure in the signal using penalties to encourage spatial smoothness. Spatial wavelet shrinkage methods impose a threshold on coefficients in the wavelet domain to recover a sparse signal (Donoho and Johnstone, 1994;Taswell, 2000;Jansen, 2001;Yadav et al, 2014;He and Xiang, 2017). These regularization methods can be applied to high-dimensional data, but require presetting the tuning parameters via cross validation (Mallick and Yi, 2013) and fail to account for all sources of uncertainty.…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the nonconvex objective function in (8), the convergence of iterates in the algorithm cannot be theoretically guaranteed. To yield a convergence result, several strategies have been adopted such as replacing the ℓ 0 pseudo-norm by ℓ 1 norm [28,29,30], and gradually decreasing the regularization parameters during iterations [13], etc.…”
Section: ) Compute the Tight Frame Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References [20][21][22][23] propose using pixel replacement or pixel value substitution to encrypt image content. References [24][25][26][27][28] encrypt the image by changing the transform coefficient of the image in the frequency domain. Similar to the problems of anonymization technology, data encryption technology will also make corresponding assumptions for attacks and then design the corresponding encryption algorithm based on these assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%