2020
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.13357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet filters for automated recognition of birdsong in long‐time field recordings

Abstract: Ecoacoustics has the potential to provide a large amount of information about the abundance of many animal species at a relatively low cost. Acoustic recording units are widely used in field data collection, but the facilities to reliably process the data recorded – recognizing calls that are relatively infrequent, and often significantly degraded by noise and distance to the microphone – are not well‐developed yet. We propose a call detection method for continuous field recordings that can be trained quickly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several options for researchers wanting to construct a call recognizer. They vary in complexity, from commercial off‐the‐shelf programmes such as Kaleidoscope (Wildlife Acoustics Inc.), to more recently, advanced machine learning algorithms (Koops, van Balen, & Wiering, 2014; Salamon & Bello, 2017), acoustic indices (Towsey, Wimmer, Williamson, & Roe, 2014), and wavelet‐based approaches (Priyadarshani, Marsland, Juodakis, Castro, & Listanti, 2020). Although the computational processes behind each differ, the basic premise remains the same; a computer is trained to detect and evaluate acoustic signals by comparing them to a known target signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several options for researchers wanting to construct a call recognizer. They vary in complexity, from commercial off‐the‐shelf programmes such as Kaleidoscope (Wildlife Acoustics Inc.), to more recently, advanced machine learning algorithms (Koops, van Balen, & Wiering, 2014; Salamon & Bello, 2017), acoustic indices (Towsey, Wimmer, Williamson, & Roe, 2014), and wavelet‐based approaches (Priyadarshani, Marsland, Juodakis, Castro, & Listanti, 2020). Although the computational processes behind each differ, the basic premise remains the same; a computer is trained to detect and evaluate acoustic signals by comparing them to a known target signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common aim of ecologists using these data concerns assigning them into predefined classes, such as ecological states or biological entities. Typical examples include the recognition of bird species from sound recordings (e.g., Priyadarshani, Marsland, Juodakis, Castro, & Listanti 2020), the distinction between phases in the annual life cycle of plants (i.e., ‘phenophases’) from spectral time series (Melaas, Friedl, & Zhu 2013), or the recognition of behavioural states from animal movement data (Shamoun-Baranes, Bouten, van Loon, Meijer, & Camphuysen 2016). Many other examples exist, with scopes of application that range from the molecular level (Jaakkola, Diekhans, & Haussler 2000) to the global scale (e.g., Schneider, Friedl, & Potere 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assignment of time series into one of two or more predefined classes (hereafter referred to as ‘time series classification’; Keogh and Kasetty 2003) can be performed using a variety of different approaches, ranging from manual, expert-based, classification (Priyadarshani et al, 2020) to fully automated procedures (see Bagnall, Lines, Bostrom, Large, & Keogh 2017 for examples). In ecology, time series classification is generally approached by processing the time series data into a new set of ‘static’ variables - using hand-designed transformations, or techniques such as Fourier or wavelet transforms - and then using these variables as predictors in ‘classical’ classification algorithms, such as logistic or multinomial regressions or random forests (e.g., Reside, VanDerWal, Kutt, & Perkins 2010; Shamoun-Baranes et al, 2016; Dyderski, Paź, Frelich, & Jagodziński 2017; Capinha, 2019; Priyadarshani et al, 2020). In machine learning terminology, this approach is known as ‘feature-based’, where the ‘features’ are the variables that are extracted from the time series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Priyadarshani ve ark., dalgacık düğümlerinin bir alt kümesinden sesin yeniden yapılandırılmasına dayanan, yeni türler üzerinde hızlı ve kolay bir şekilde eğitilebilecek, sürekli saha kayıtları için bir kuş çağrı sesi algılama yöntemi önermiştir. Çalışmalarında Rocky Dağı Biyoloji Laboratuvarına (Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory -RMBL) ait Amerika Kızılgerdanları veri setini de kullanmışlardır [10].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified