2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23762-2_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet Convolution Neural Network for Classification of Spiculated Findings in Mammograms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AUC of the CNN was 0.87, which was higher than the radiologists' mean AUC (0.84), although the difference was not significant. On the other hand, the studies discussed in 40 , 41 circumvent the use of deep learning by adopting wavelet decomposition.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AUC of the CNN was 0.87, which was higher than the radiologists' mean AUC (0.84), although the difference was not significant. On the other hand, the studies discussed in 40 , 41 circumvent the use of deep learning by adopting wavelet decomposition.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance comparison of proposed framework for both CBIS-DDSM and MIAS databases with other existing framework (CNN based texture feature based) is shown in Table IV. For CBIS-DDSM database, the proposed framework has given better performance than the CNN based approaches [13], [36], [38], [39], [42]. In [36], authors used bag of visual words with CNN for both segment-free and segment dependent based classification and the segment-free based method has shown better performance.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of Proposed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(feature like local binary pattern, global image descriptor, and histogram of oriented grading) and deep features from DenseNet and VGG. In[42] authors have used DWT (level-2) and extracted features from detail subband images. Finally, CNN is used for classification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies are completely dependent on segmentation and hand-crafted features, which are not optimal. In some studies, wavelet coefficients and features extracted from wavelet coefficients have been used to detect breast abnormalities in mammograms (5,6). In these methods, it is necessary to define hand-crafted features to detect and classify mass regions in mammograms; therefore, the performance of these methods is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%