2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet based shock wave and muzzle blast classification for different supersonic projectiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary tests suggest that the pressure integrated with time over the first peak of the Mach wave features less shot-to-shot variations. Filtering of Mach wave reflections is an area of investigation [19]. Last, our results suggest that the transverse coherence length is smaller than the inter-distance between our microphones.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Preliminary tests suggest that the pressure integrated with time over the first peak of the Mach wave features less shot-to-shot variations. Filtering of Mach wave reflections is an area of investigation [19]. Last, our results suggest that the transverse coherence length is smaller than the inter-distance between our microphones.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The approximation l p = 4d p is considered, in lines with a common practice [21,19]. Whereas standard projectiles may feature proportionality coefficients up to 8, the dependence in bullet's shape is of second order in these equations [29,15].…”
Section: Range Estimation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously noted, a gunshot surveillance system must be able to detect an impulsive signal and to identify if it is a muzzle blast component, a shockwave component, or none of them. There is a vast literature available about this matter [41,42,43,44,45,46].…”
Section: Doa Estimation and Shooter Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The US Army's Ballistic Research Laboratory (BRL) has developed a prediction method for muzzle devices [32] based on gathered experimental data on muzzle devices for distances from 10 to 50 calibers from the muzzle [33][34][35]. Helliker and other scientists [16,27,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42] investigated many different muzzle devices including a silencer. The outputs of the models were not verified against experimental test data from muzzle blasts, which differ to conventional blast waves [43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%