2007
DOI: 10.3844/jcssp.2007.454.460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet and ANN Based Relaying for Power Transformer Protection

Abstract: This paper presents an efficient wavelet and neural network (WNN) based algorithm for distinguishing magnetizing inrush currents from internal fault currents in three phase power transformers. The wavelet transform is applied first to decompose the current signals of the power transformer into a series of detailed wavelet components. The values of the detailed coefficients obtained can accurately discriminate between an internal fault and magnetizing inrush currents in power transformers. The detailed coeffici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid the tripping operation dependency to such a threshold many novel methods have been proposed. These approaches includes: autoregressive process based on power spectrum of harmonics [2], wavelet transform based schemes [3][4][5][6][7][8][9], artificial neural networks [8][9][10], leakage inductance based techniques [11,12], harmonic characteristics [13], induced voltage based method [14], correlation transform [15] and Hidden Markov Model (HMM) [16]. The main drawbacks of priori methods are determining an exact restrain threshold, long data window requirement, sensitivity to noise, delayed fault detection and voltage transformers requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the tripping operation dependency to such a threshold many novel methods have been proposed. These approaches includes: autoregressive process based on power spectrum of harmonics [2], wavelet transform based schemes [3][4][5][6][7][8][9], artificial neural networks [8][9][10], leakage inductance based techniques [11,12], harmonic characteristics [13], induced voltage based method [14], correlation transform [15] and Hidden Markov Model (HMM) [16]. The main drawbacks of priori methods are determining an exact restrain threshold, long data window requirement, sensitivity to noise, delayed fault detection and voltage transformers requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To discriminate between internal faults and inrush currents other approaches such as power differential method, transformer inductance variation, flux and voltage restraints and artificial neural networks are presented [6][7][8][9][10]. These approaches depend on parameters of the protected transformer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the tripping operation dependency to such a threshold many novel methods have been proposed. These approaches includes: autoregressive process based on power spectrum of harmonics [2], wavelet transform based schemes [3][4][5][6][7][8][9], artificial neural networks [8][9][10], leakage inductance based techniques [11,12], harmonic characteristics [13], induced voltage based method [14] and correlation transform [15]. The main drawbacks of priori methods are determining an exact restrain threshold, long data window requirement, sensitivity to noise, delayed fault detection and voltage transformers requirements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%