2018
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet analysis techniques in cavitating flows

Abstract: Cavitating and bubbly flows involve a host of physical phenomena and processes ranging from nucleation, surface and interfacial effects, mass transfer via diffusion and phase change to macroscopic flow physics involving bubble dynamics, turbulent flow interactions and two-phase compressible effects. The complex physics that result from these phenomena and their interactions make for flows that are difficult to investigate and analyse. From an experimental perspective, evolving sensing technology and data proce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a third frequency is also evident in spectra from surface pressure and high-speed imaging that only occurs at a cavitation number of about 0.8. The two dominant frequencies are attributed to axisymmetric and asymmetric global modes and the third to due local flow effects [21,22]. Recently similar experiments have been made with a nuclei abundant flow.…”
Section: Nucleation Effects On Cavitation Physicsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Although a third frequency is also evident in spectra from surface pressure and high-speed imaging that only occurs at a cavitation number of about 0.8. The two dominant frequencies are attributed to axisymmetric and asymmetric global modes and the third to due local flow effects [21,22]. Recently similar experiments have been made with a nuclei abundant flow.…”
Section: Nucleation Effects On Cavitation Physicsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The CRL tunnel has ancillary systems for rapid degassing and the circuit architecture enables continuous injection and removal of cavitation nuclei and large volumes of incondensable gas. Further description of the facility is given in Brandner, Venning & Pearce (2018).
Figure 1.Tunnel schematic showing the experimental layout including the microbubble nuclei injection, contraction, test section and diffuser.
…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2020 a , b ), which utilises off-focus imaging of the spherical microbubbles illuminated with a coherent, polarised light source to determine the size of each bubble. The images were processed using a continuous wavelet transform (Brandner, Venning & Pearce 2018) to give the non-cumulative distribution in diameter for typical test pressures ranging between 50 and 30 kPa, as shown in the upper right plot in figure 4. The injected population may also be approximated with a power law for all but the larger sized, but low concentration, bubbles.…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%