2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet analysis of static deflections for multiple damage identification in beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sharma and Pachori [17], in turn, proposed an iterative decomposition of the Hankel matrix, enabling the decomposition of the monocompetent signal and following Hilbert transform, the amplitude is determined as well as frequency functions of each decomposed component. Another use of wavelet analysis can be found, for example, in [18][19][20]. Yeap et al [21] and Sejdić et al [22] summarise some of the advantages and disadvantages of the FFT and WT methods.…”
Section: Signal Analysis and Anomaly Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharma and Pachori [17], in turn, proposed an iterative decomposition of the Hankel matrix, enabling the decomposition of the monocompetent signal and following Hilbert transform, the amplitude is determined as well as frequency functions of each decomposed component. Another use of wavelet analysis can be found, for example, in [18][19][20]. Yeap et al [21] and Sejdić et al [22] summarise some of the advantages and disadvantages of the FFT and WT methods.…”
Section: Signal Analysis and Anomaly Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Song et al [ 6 ] used the static strain data to obtain the corresponding static displacement for detecting structural damages. Ma et al [ 7 ] employed wavelet analysis to diagnose structural defects using the static displacements of the structures. The fault position can be determined from the wavelet maxima lines and the fault severity can be assessed by the wavelet coefficients along the corresponding maxima lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there is always a difference between a model and a real structure, which can not be ascertained unless it is identified using measurements. In this paper, existing formulation of a Damage Locating Index (DLI) and a Damage Severity Index (DSI) [1] based on the Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) and Lipschitz exponent are redefined and extended for the application of damage identification from the experimental mode shapes of a damaged beam. The paper explores the applicability of the identification method from three perspectives: (1) the robustness and limitations of the proposed DLI on an oscillating signal (mode shapes) obtained from a sparse measuring grid; (2) the application of the DSI to modal displacements and its independence from boundary conditions and damage location; and (3) the potential use of the same DSI Reference values from either a static or any modal response for the evaluation of the damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar and Singh [8] compares the use of 100, 200, and 1000 measurement points for the application of CWT for damage detection and indicates that the accuracy of the results is affected significantly. Hence, numerical studies on this topic consider usually a high number of measurement points and the experimental studies are conducted with measuring systems that can obtain a dense measurement grid, such as laser scanning [7,11] and photogrammetry measuring system [1,8,[12][13][14]. In Table 1, the number of samples in some relevant research studies are listed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%